東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Academic librarians participation in...

Turner, Brenda Gale White.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Academic librarians participation in shared governance: Effects of faculty leaders' motivational type.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Academic librarians participation in shared governance: Effects of faculty leaders' motivational type./
作者:	Turner, Brenda Gale White.
面頁冊數:	156 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-01, Section: A, page: 0013.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International66-01A.
標題:	Library Science. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3160686
ISBN:	0496942433

Academic librarians participation in shared governance: Effects of faculty leaders' motivational type.
Turner, Brenda Gale White.

Academic librarians participation in shared governance: Effects of faculty leaders' motivational type. - 156 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-01, Section: A, page: 0013.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Florida State University, 2004.

This study asks the question: Does the motivational type of faculty leaders, including Chief Academic Officers (CAOs), affect the participation of academic librarians in shared governance in higher education. The literature reveals that librarians' participation in shared governance is minimal and may continue to be so for a variety of reasons including, but not limited to, obstacles from faculty and administration, self-exclusion, and academic credentials.

ISBN: 0496942433Subjects--Topical Terms:

881164
Library Science.

Academic librarians participation in shared governance: Effects of faculty leaders' motivational type.
LDR:03349nmm 2200337 4500 001 1849391
005 20051206073027.5
008 130614s2004 eng d
020 $a 0496942433
035 $a (UnM)AAI3160686
035 $a AAI3160686
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Turner, Brenda Gale White. $3 1937351
245 1 0 $a Academic librarians participation in shared governance: Effects of faculty leaders' motivational type.
300 $a 156 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-01, Section: A, page: 0013.
500 $a Major Professor: Jane Robbins.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Florida State University, 2004.
520 $a This study asks the question: Does the motivational type of faculty leaders, including Chief Academic Officers (CAOs), affect the participation of academic librarians in shared governance in higher education. The literature reveals that librarians' participation in shared governance is minimal and may continue to be so for a variety of reasons including, but not limited to, obstacles from faculty and administration, self-exclusion, and academic credentials.
520 $a The study surveys faculty leaders, including CAOs, from Alabama Council of Independent Colleges. Data collection includes part one of a commercially produced instrument, The Power Management Inventory ( PMI), and a modified University Shared Governance Survey (USGS) borrowed from a dissertation by Persson.
520 $a The PMI investigates the motivational type of faculty leaders and groups them into one of three types ("affiliative," "personalized" or "socialized" power) as identified by motivational theorist, David C. McClelland. In this study, one (1) respondent ties two groups and is categorized as a "mixed" motivational type.
520 $a The USGS asks opinions of faculty leaders regarding issue areas where academic librarians may be allowed to participate in shared governance. Issue areas include academic, financial and personnel, institutional, and student affairs. Demographic data is also collected.
520 $a An Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was applied to determine if there are any statistically significant differences between faculty leaders' by motivational type and opinion. ANOVA testing revealed that there were no statistically significant differences between the faculty leaders' motivational groups and their opinions about academic librarians' participation in shared governance. Statistical significance was found when pairing opinion with gender on three questions from the institutional affairs issue area; question #2 F(1,40) = 4.08, p < .05; question #3 F(1,40) = 5.406, p < .05; and, question #9 F(1,40) = 4.143, p < .05. Statistical significance was also found when pairing opinion with academic rank on question #5 F(5,36) = 2.817, p < .05 of financial and personnel affairs and on questions #2 F(5,36) = 2.604, p < .05 and #3 F(5,36) = 2.721, p < .05 of student affairs thus replicating some findings by Persson. Post hoc and Eta-squared tests were applied.
590 $a School code: 0071.
650 4 $a Library Science. $3 881164
650 4 $a Education, Higher. $3 543175
650 4 $a Education, Administration. $3 626645
690 $a 0399
690 $a 0745
690 $a 0514
710 2 0 $a The Florida State University. $3 1017727
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 66-01A.
790 1 0 $a Robbins, Jane, $e advisor
790 $a 0071
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2004
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3160686