東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Ontological transformations for Chri...

Lam, Wing Keung.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Ontological transformations for Christian-Buddhist dialogue: A comparative study of John Hick and Abe Masao.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Ontological transformations for Christian-Buddhist dialogue: A comparative study of John Hick and Abe Masao./
作者:	Lam, Wing Keung.
面頁冊數:	301 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 65-11, Section: A, page: 4229.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International65-11A.
標題:	Philosophy. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3155050
ISBN:	049615592X

Ontological transformations for Christian-Buddhist dialogue: A comparative study of John Hick and Abe Masao.
Lam, Wing Keung.

Ontological transformations for Christian-Buddhist dialogue: A comparative study of John Hick and Abe Masao. - 301 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 65-11, Section: A, page: 4229.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (People's Republic of China), 2004.

This paper attempts to explore the meanings and significance of the ontological transformations that proposed by John Hick (1922&sim; ) and Abe Masao (1915&sim; ) in the context of Christian-Buddhist dialogue. Not only will I take a close study of the two very controversial and insightful proposals for ontological transformation that suggested by Hick and Abe respectively, namely, the Real and the kenotic God, but also examine its significance on Christian and Buddhist axiology and the hermeneutic issue for Christian-Buddhist dialogue. What I want to argue in this paper is, in the course of transforming the idea of Christian God, we should not only focus on the ontological disputes between Christianity and Buddhism, but also the methodological question, that is, how Hick and Abe make their interpretations on Christian God. By borrowing the metaphorical approach of Hick, I will show how his methodology for interpretation is comparatively effective and less costly while conducting the transformation of Christian God in the context of Christian-Buddhist dialogue. Not only can it apply to the Real and the metaphorical God incarnate that Hick himself proposes, but also to the kenotic God that Abe suggests. For my part, in face of the very fundamental and seemingly irresolvable ontological confrontations between Christianity and Buddhism, should we not only confine to compare and contrast their similarities and differences, of which I think there may not come up with any constructive result, but also examine the question of interpretation that underlies. For whenever a dialogue takes place, the activity of interpretation undergoes through the medium of language. Particular on the ontological debate between Christianity and Buddhism, I believe that the question of interpretation is more important and should be dealt with now and in the future, instead of entangling with the debate of whether Christian God is substantial or not.

ISBN: 049615592XSubjects--Topical Terms:

516511
Philosophy.

Ontological transformations for Christian-Buddhist dialogue: A comparative study of John Hick and Abe Masao.
LDR:02916nmm 2200277 4500 001 1849383
005 20051206073026.5
008 130614s2004 eng d
020 $a 049615592X
035 $a (UnM)AAI3155050
035 $a AAI3155050
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Lam, Wing Keung. $3 1937343
245 1 0 $a Ontological transformations for Christian-Buddhist dialogue: A comparative study of John Hick and Abe Masao.
300 $a 301 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 65-11, Section: A, page: 4229.
500 $a Adviser: Bockja Kim.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (People's Republic of China), 2004.
520 $a This paper attempts to explore the meanings and significance of the ontological transformations that proposed by John Hick (1922&sim; ) and Abe Masao (1915&sim; ) in the context of Christian-Buddhist dialogue. Not only will I take a close study of the two very controversial and insightful proposals for ontological transformation that suggested by Hick and Abe respectively, namely, the Real and the kenotic God, but also examine its significance on Christian and Buddhist axiology and the hermeneutic issue for Christian-Buddhist dialogue. What I want to argue in this paper is, in the course of transforming the idea of Christian God, we should not only focus on the ontological disputes between Christianity and Buddhism, but also the methodological question, that is, how Hick and Abe make their interpretations on Christian God. By borrowing the metaphorical approach of Hick, I will show how his methodology for interpretation is comparatively effective and less costly while conducting the transformation of Christian God in the context of Christian-Buddhist dialogue. Not only can it apply to the Real and the metaphorical God incarnate that Hick himself proposes, but also to the kenotic God that Abe suggests. For my part, in face of the very fundamental and seemingly irresolvable ontological confrontations between Christianity and Buddhism, should we not only confine to compare and contrast their similarities and differences, of which I think there may not come up with any constructive result, but also examine the question of interpretation that underlies. For whenever a dialogue takes place, the activity of interpretation undergoes through the medium of language. Particular on the ontological debate between Christianity and Buddhism, I believe that the question of interpretation is more important and should be dealt with now and in the future, instead of entangling with the debate of whether Christian God is substantial or not.
590 $a School code: 1223.
650 4 $a Philosophy. $3 516511
650 4 $a Religion, Philosophy of. $3 1017774
690 $a 0422
690 $a 0322
710 2 0 $a Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (People's Republic of China). $3 1249812
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 65-11A.
790 1 0 $a Kim, Bockja, $e advisor
790 $a 1223
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2004
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3155050