東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Emigration and human capital: Who le...

Lacuesta, Aitor.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Emigration and human capital: Who leaves, who comes back and what difference does it make.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Emigration and human capital: Who leaves, who comes back and what difference does it make./
作者:	Lacuesta, Aitor.
面頁冊數:	117 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-03, Section: A, page: 1109.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International66-03A.
標題:	Economics, Labor. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3168359
ISBN:	0542042479

Emigration and human capital: Who leaves, who comes back and what difference does it make.
Lacuesta, Aitor.

Emigration and human capital: Who leaves, who comes back and what difference does it make. - 117 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-03, Section: A, page: 1109.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Chicago, 2005.

This thesis studies the characteristics of international migration in order to estimate some effects of emigration on labor market outcomes in the origin country. I extend the standard model by Borjas (1987) incorporating returning migration as a sequential choice. Under relatively weak conditions, characteristics that make individuals more likely to migrate make also migrants less likely to come back.

ISBN: 0542042479Subjects--Topical Terms:

1019135
Economics, Labor.

Emigration and human capital: Who leaves, who comes back and what difference does it make.
LDR:03197nmm 2200325 4500 001 1847311
005 20051107081555.5
008 130614s2005 eng d
020 $a 0542042479
035 $a (UnM)AAI3168359
035 $a AAI3168359
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Lacuesta, Aitor. $3 1935367
245 1 0 $a Emigration and human capital: Who leaves, who comes back and what difference does it make.
300 $a 117 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-03, Section: A, page: 1109.
500 $a Adviser: Casey B. Mulligan.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Chicago, 2005.
520 $a This thesis studies the characteristics of international migration in order to estimate some effects of emigration on labor market outcomes in the origin country. I extend the standard model by Borjas (1987) incorporating returning migration as a sequential choice. Under relatively weak conditions, characteristics that make individuals more likely to migrate make also migrants less likely to come back.
520 $a I use the Mexican and the American census to compare migrants with non migrants. I show that the usage of the two censuses is a valuable technique to study self selection on those flows. Underreporting of immigrants in the American census, although important in terms of magnitude, does not create a large bias when estimating the distribution of characteristics of the actual stock/flow of migrants.
520 $a Using the available data for the Mexican case I show some evidence that returning migration is a sequential decision for more than 50% of all returnees. The observed selection of returning migrants compared to the selection of migrants is exactly as the previous model predicted.
520 $a I then study several effects of emigration on different labor market outcomes. First, I analyze the effect of emigration on labor market outcomes of returning migrants. On the one hand, I show that not many of them changed their labor status after their migration. On the other hand, returning migrants earn a wage differential of 10% respect to non migrants, but this could be attributed to pre migration differences instead of human capital gains. Second, I analyze the human capital loss that emigration produces in Mexico. I non-parametrically estimate the Mexican human capital of emigrants using returning migrants' wages in order to partially account for differences in unobserved characteristics. I show evidence that those non returning migrants are mainly drawn from the middle part of the distribution of human capital. This evidence is consistent with previous findings by Hanson and Chiquiar (2002) that only considered differences in observed characteristics. I finally expose the importance of getting this estimation right if we want to estimate the effects of emigration on wages of those left behind in the short run.
590 $a School code: 0330.
650 4 $a Economics, Labor. $3 1019135
650 4 $a Economics, General. $3 1017424
650 4 $a Sociology, Demography. $3 1020257
690 $a 0510
690 $a 0501
690 $a 0938
710 2 0 $a The University of Chicago. $3 1017389
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 66-03A.
790 1 0 $a Mulligan, Casey B., $e advisor
790 $a 0330
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2005
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3168359