東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

How Luke was written.

Olson, Kenneth A.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

How Luke was written.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	How Luke was written./
作者:	Olson, Kenneth A.
面頁冊數:	62 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 42-05, page: 1529.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International42-05.
標題:	History, Ancient. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1419294
ISBN:	049624065X

How Luke was written.
Olson, Kenneth A.

How Luke was written. - 62 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 42-05, page: 1529.

Thesis (M.A.)--University of Maryland, College Park, 2004.

This thesis examines the viability of the Farrer theory of how The Gospel According to Luke was written in light of the influential criticisms of that theory by F. G. Downing. Downing argues that on Farrer's theory, Luke has departed from known compositional procedures of Graeco-Roman authors in deserting the common witness of his sources, in picking out Matthew's additions to Mark from Matthew's gospel to use in his own work, and in removing the Markan parallels from the Matthean additions that he has picked out. This thesis will argue to the contrary that in following one of his sources at a time rather than trying to follow both simultaneously, and in using material from his second (Matthean) source to supplement his main (Markan) source, Farrer's Luke appears to be following accepted ancient compositional methods, and that he has no demonstrable tendency to remove Markan parallels from his use of Matthew.

ISBN: 049624065XSubjects--Topical Terms:

516261
History, Ancient.

How Luke was written.
LDR:01752nmm 2200289 4500 001 1846950
005 20051103093605.5
008 130614s2004 eng d
020 $a 049624065X
035 $a (UnM)AAI1419294
035 $a AAI1419294
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Olson, Kenneth A. $3 1935036
245 1 0 $a How Luke was written.
300 $a 62 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 42-05, page: 1529.
500 $a Chair: Hayim Lapin.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--University of Maryland, College Park, 2004.
520 $a This thesis examines the viability of the Farrer theory of how The Gospel According to Luke was written in light of the influential criticisms of that theory by F. G. Downing. Downing argues that on Farrer's theory, Luke has departed from known compositional procedures of Graeco-Roman authors in deserting the common witness of his sources, in picking out Matthew's additions to Mark from Matthew's gospel to use in his own work, and in removing the Markan parallels from the Matthean additions that he has picked out. This thesis will argue to the contrary that in following one of his sources at a time rather than trying to follow both simultaneously, and in using material from his second (Matthean) source to supplement his main (Markan) source, Farrer's Luke appears to be following accepted ancient compositional methods, and that he has no demonstrable tendency to remove Markan parallels from his use of Matthew.
590 $a School code: 0117.
650 4 $a History, Ancient. $3 516261
650 4 $a Religion, Biblical Studies. $3 1020189
650 4 $a Literature, Classical. $3 1017779
690 $a 0579
690 $a 0321
690 $a 0294
710 2 0 $a University of Maryland, College Park. $3 657686
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 42-05.
790 1 0 $a Lapin, Hayim, $e advisor
790 $a 0117
791 $a M.A.
792 $a 2004
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1419294