東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

A new approach to enhance group idea...

Jung, Jay J. H.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

A new approach to enhance group ideation: The effect of verbal-EBS on cognitive stimulation.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	A new approach to enhance group ideation: The effect of verbal-EBS on cognitive stimulation./
作者:	Jung, Jay J. H.
面頁冊數:	125 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 65-03, Section: A, page: 0739.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International65-03A.
標題:	Information Science. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3125507
ISBN:	0496727960

A new approach to enhance group ideation: The effect of verbal-EBS on cognitive stimulation.
Jung, Jay J. H.

A new approach to enhance group ideation: The effect of verbal-EBS on cognitive stimulation. - 125 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 65-03, Section: A, page: 0739.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Washington State University, 2003.

Notwithstanding superior performance of electronic brainstorming (EBS) over Nominal and Face-to-Face brainstorming, prior group brainstorming studies point out many remaining crucial process losses (e.g., idea production time underutilization, attention blocking, cognitive inertia, cognitive interference by information overload, and incomplete use of information) that hold back group performance. Thus far, studies have focused on how to improve process gains while neglecting how to mitigate process losses that may be more efficient and effective to enhance group productivity. The proposed research introduced Verbal-EBS that combines the best of both communication modes, speaking and reading, by integrating speech recognition technology with group memory, which is one of the built-ins of existing EBS, and then investigated how to increase the idea production time and the quantity and quality of ideas. A laboratory experiment comparing the performance among Verbal-EBS, Typing-EBS, and Nominal-based EBS was used to test a set of theoretically grounded hypotheses. As prior computer-mediated studies and orality studies in communication suggested that (1) typing is slower than speaking, while reading is faster than listening, and (2) searching for good ideas to build on is possible with the support of group memory of EBS while speaking but not while writing or typing, individuals who were given Verbal-EBS treatment performed nearly twice as well as individuals with typing treatment. The results enhance our current understanding of group brainstorming that includes how and why Verbal-EBS is theoretically and practically different from traditional Typing-EBS.

ISBN: 0496727960Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017528
Information Science.

A new approach to enhance group ideation: The effect of verbal-EBS on cognitive stimulation.
LDR:02612nmm 2200289 4500 001 1841637
005 20050915140257.5
008 130614s2003 eng d
020 $a 0496727960
035 $a (UnM)AAI3125507
035 $a AAI3125507
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Jung, Jay J. H. $3 1929924
245 1 2 $a A new approach to enhance group ideation: The effect of verbal-EBS on cognitive stimulation.
300 $a 125 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 65-03, Section: A, page: 0739.
500 $a Chair: Joseph S. Valacich.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Washington State University, 2003.
520 $a Notwithstanding superior performance of electronic brainstorming (EBS) over Nominal and Face-to-Face brainstorming, prior group brainstorming studies point out many remaining crucial process losses (e.g., idea production time underutilization, attention blocking, cognitive inertia, cognitive interference by information overload, and incomplete use of information) that hold back group performance. Thus far, studies have focused on how to improve process gains while neglecting how to mitigate process losses that may be more efficient and effective to enhance group productivity. The proposed research introduced Verbal-EBS that combines the best of both communication modes, speaking and reading, by integrating speech recognition technology with group memory, which is one of the built-ins of existing EBS, and then investigated how to increase the idea production time and the quantity and quality of ideas. A laboratory experiment comparing the performance among Verbal-EBS, Typing-EBS, and Nominal-based EBS was used to test a set of theoretically grounded hypotheses. As prior computer-mediated studies and orality studies in communication suggested that (1) typing is slower than speaking, while reading is faster than listening, and (2) searching for good ideas to build on is possible with the support of group memory of EBS while speaking but not while writing or typing, individuals who were given Verbal-EBS treatment performed nearly twice as well as individuals with typing treatment. The results enhance our current understanding of group brainstorming that includes how and why Verbal-EBS is theoretically and practically different from traditional Typing-EBS.
590 $a School code: 0251.
650 4 $a Information Science. $3 1017528
650 4 $a Education, Business. $3 1017515
650 4 $a Education, Social Sciences. $3 1019148
690 $a 0723
690 $a 0688
690 $a 0534
710 2 0 $a Washington State University. $3 678588
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 65-03A.
790 1 0 $a Valacich, Joseph S., $e advisor
790 $a 0251
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2003
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3125507