東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The use of federal college tuition t...

Silliman, Benjamin Rue.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The use of federal college tuition tax credits at public community colleges: A capacity-building policy analysis.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The use of federal college tuition tax credits at public community colleges: A capacity-building policy analysis./
作者:	Silliman, Benjamin Rue.
面頁冊數:	789 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 65-03, Section: A, page: 0859.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International65-03A.
標題:	Education, Higher. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3124964
ISBN:	0496722668

The use of federal college tuition tax credits at public community colleges: A capacity-building policy analysis.
Silliman, Benjamin Rue.

The use of federal college tuition tax credits at public community colleges: A capacity-building policy analysis. - 789 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 65-03, Section: A, page: 0859.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--New York University, 2004.

This study examined the use of college tuition tax credits at public community colleges. For nearly three decades, the U.S. Congress has provided federal student aid programs to assist students in paying for college costs. During this same time, tax credits were debated by Congress as an alternative to the federal aid programs. In 1997, President Bill Clinton signed into law the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997, authorizing the federal HOPE Scholarship (HOPE) and the Lifetime Learning Tax Credit (LLTC). The HOPE and LLTC provisions were structured to pay for the cost of a "typical community college" (Clinton, 1997). These two new "non-refundable" tax credits exist today alongside the federal student aid programs. The projected cost of these tax credits through 2002 is

ISBN: 0496722668Subjects--Topical Terms:

543175
Education, Higher.

The use of federal college tuition tax credits at public community colleges: A capacity-building policy analysis.
LDR:03352nmm 2200337 4500 001 1841634
005 20050915140257.5
008 130614s2004 eng d
020 $a 0496722668
035 $a (UnM)AAI3124964
035 $a AAI3124964
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Silliman, Benjamin Rue. $3 1929921
245 1 4 $a The use of federal college tuition tax credits at public community colleges: A capacity-building policy analysis.
300 $a 789 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 65-03, Section: A, page: 0859.
500 $a Chairperson: Joshua Smith.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--New York University, 2004.
520 $a This study examined the use of college tuition tax credits at public community colleges. For nearly three decades, the U.S. Congress has provided federal student aid programs to assist students in paying for college costs. During this same time, tax credits were debated by Congress as an alternative to the federal aid programs. In 1997, President Bill Clinton signed into law the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997, authorizing the federal HOPE Scholarship (HOPE) and the Lifetime Learning Tax Credit (LLTC). The HOPE and LLTC provisions were structured to pay for the cost of a "typical community college" (Clinton, 1997). These two new "non-refundable" tax credits exist today alongside the federal student aid programs. The projected cost of these tax credits through 2002 is $4 0 billion (Conklin, 1998).
520 $a Since the HOPE and LLTC were enacted, several projections indicate that the primary beneficiaries are individuals with adjusted gross incomes between $4 0,000 and $8 0,000. Researchers initially projected students attending community colleges would not benefit from either tax credit, contrary to the intent of the policy. In particular, projections indicated that Pell Grant recipients at community colleges would not qualify for either tax credit.
520 $a The purpose of this study was to describe the use of the federal HOPE and LLTC of students (or their families) attending public community colleges in 1998 through the use of a capacity-building policy model. The research design was secondary data analysis, which collected tax and financial aid data using the Federal Quality Assurance Program. The research questions identified for this study examined the use (tax credit claimants versus non-claimants) of the tax credits at four public community colleges nationwide. Some of the variables examined include: adjusted gross income, taxes paid, Pell Grant award, paid-preparer stamp, computer-prepared taxes, amount of earned income tax credit, etc. Also, using these variables, multiple regression analysis was performed to determine if relationships exist between the tax credits and independent variables indicated above. In addition, to understand the use of college tax credits, an extensive historical literature review was conducted to determine the main elements that impacted the development of the policy over thirty-two years.
590 $a School code: 0146.
650 4 $a Education, Higher. $3 543175
650 4 $a Business Administration, Accounting. $3 1020666
650 4 $a Political Science, Public Administration. $3 1017438
650 4 $a Education, Community College. $3 1018008
650 4 $a Education, Finance. $3 1020300
690 $a 0745
690 $a 0272
690 $a 0617
690 $a 0275
690 $a 0277
710 2 0 $a New York University. $3 515735
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 65-03A.
790 1 0 $a Smith, Joshua, $e advisor
790 $a 0146
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 2004
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3124964