語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
Preaching science or promoting citiz...
~
DeCesare, Michael A.
FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
Preaching science or promoting citizenship? Teaching sociology in high school.
紀錄類型:
書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
Preaching science or promoting citizenship? Teaching sociology in high school./
作者:
DeCesare, Michael A.
面頁冊數:
252 p.
附註:
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 65-06, Section: A, page: 2367.
Contained By:
Dissertation Abstracts International65-06A.
標題:
Sociology, General. -
電子資源:
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3136719
ISBN:
0496839154
Preaching science or promoting citizenship? Teaching sociology in high school.
DeCesare, Michael A.
Preaching science or promoting citizenship? Teaching sociology in high school.
- 252 p.
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 65-06, Section: A, page: 2367.
Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Massachusetts Amherst, 2004.
This dissertation seeks to answer two questions. First, why is an introductory sociology course offered in only some high schools? Second, what are the larger historical, intellectual, and structural forces that have shaped and currently shape the content and objectives of high school sociology courses, and how have they exerted an influence? The first question has been answered only once before and the second has never been asked. Regarding the first, I argue that teacher changes and shortages, students' needs and desires, ongoing curriculum revision, the movement toward standardized testing, and the school budget all play a role in determining whether sociology is offered in a particular school from one year to the next. My attempt to answer the second research question brings together the subfields of the sociology of sociology and the scholarship of teaching and learning. I demonstrate that teachers' decisions about course content and objectives are not entirely idiosyncratic, as is often implicitly assumed in the scholarship of teaching and learning. I show instead that decisions about the content and objectives of the high school course are the products of both individual and contextual factors, thus bringing the sociology of sociology's insights to bear on teaching. Specifically, I document how two groups have tried to shape the high school sociology course. On one hand, teachers have consistently taught social problems with an eye toward developing good citizens. Their formulation of content and objectives has been shaped by the historical and social context, curriculum pressures, the textbook market, students' needs and desires, and the limits of their own backgrounds and educations. Sociologists, on the other hand, have pushed for scientific sociology in the high school classroom, especially since 1960. They have been influenced by the persistent tension within sociology between science and reform, by the New Social Studies movement of the 1960s, and by the activities and position of the American Sociological Association. I conclude with practical recommendations for bridging the historical gap between teachers and sociologists. I also recommend paying more empirical and theoretical attention to the study of teaching sociology generally.
ISBN: 0496839154Subjects--Topical Terms:
1017541
Sociology, General.
Preaching science or promoting citizenship? Teaching sociology in high school.
LDR
:03211nmm 2200289 4500
001
1841025
005
20050822121247.5
008
130614s2004 eng d
020
$a
0496839154
035
$a
(UnM)AAI3136719
035
$a
AAI3136719
040
$a
UnM
$c
UnM
100
1
$a
DeCesare, Michael A.
$3
1929340
245
1 0
$a
Preaching science or promoting citizenship? Teaching sociology in high school.
300
$a
252 p.
500
$a
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 65-06, Section: A, page: 2367.
500
$a
Director: Michael S. Lewis.
502
$a
Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Massachusetts Amherst, 2004.
520
$a
This dissertation seeks to answer two questions. First, why is an introductory sociology course offered in only some high schools? Second, what are the larger historical, intellectual, and structural forces that have shaped and currently shape the content and objectives of high school sociology courses, and how have they exerted an influence? The first question has been answered only once before and the second has never been asked. Regarding the first, I argue that teacher changes and shortages, students' needs and desires, ongoing curriculum revision, the movement toward standardized testing, and the school budget all play a role in determining whether sociology is offered in a particular school from one year to the next. My attempt to answer the second research question brings together the subfields of the sociology of sociology and the scholarship of teaching and learning. I demonstrate that teachers' decisions about course content and objectives are not entirely idiosyncratic, as is often implicitly assumed in the scholarship of teaching and learning. I show instead that decisions about the content and objectives of the high school course are the products of both individual and contextual factors, thus bringing the sociology of sociology's insights to bear on teaching. Specifically, I document how two groups have tried to shape the high school sociology course. On one hand, teachers have consistently taught social problems with an eye toward developing good citizens. Their formulation of content and objectives has been shaped by the historical and social context, curriculum pressures, the textbook market, students' needs and desires, and the limits of their own backgrounds and educations. Sociologists, on the other hand, have pushed for scientific sociology in the high school classroom, especially since 1960. They have been influenced by the persistent tension within sociology between science and reform, by the New Social Studies movement of the 1960s, and by the activities and position of the American Sociological Association. I conclude with practical recommendations for bridging the historical gap between teachers and sociologists. I also recommend paying more empirical and theoretical attention to the study of teaching sociology generally.
590
$a
School code: 0118.
650
4
$a
Sociology, General.
$3
1017541
650
4
$a
Education, Secondary.
$3
539262
650
4
$a
Education, Sociology of.
$3
626654
690
$a
0626
690
$a
0533
690
$a
0340
710
2 0
$a
University of Massachusetts Amherst.
$3
1019433
773
0
$t
Dissertation Abstracts International
$g
65-06A.
790
1 0
$a
Lewis, Michael S.,
$e
advisor
790
$a
0118
791
$a
Ph.D.
792
$a
2004
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3136719
筆 0 讀者評論
館藏地:
全部
電子資源
出版年:
卷號:
館藏
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
條碼號
典藏地名稱
館藏流通類別
資料類型
索書號
使用類型
借閱狀態
預約狀態
備註欄
附件
W9190539
電子資源
11.線上閱覽_V
電子書
EB
一般使用(Normal)
在架
0
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館
處理中
...
變更密碼
登入