東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Structural explanation of alliance: ...

Choi, Wooseon.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Structural explanation of alliance: United States-China relations, 1949--1972.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Structural explanation of alliance: United States-China relations, 1949--1972./
作者:	Choi, Wooseon.
面頁冊數:	200 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 65-12, Section: A, page: 4709.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International65-12A.
標題:	Political Science, International Law and Relations. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3158699
ISBN:	0496916963

Structural explanation of alliance: United States-China relations, 1949--1972.
Choi, Wooseon.

Structural explanation of alliance: United States-China relations, 1949--1972. - 200 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 65-12, Section: A, page: 4709.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Chicago, 2005.

My dissertation explores the alliance relationship between the U.S. and China during 1949--1972. The conventional wisdom held by many realists is that during the early Cold War period, the U.S. should have formed an alliance with China against the stronger Soviet power in Asia as it did in 1972. However, they argue, the U.S. had irrationally pursued a confrontational policy toward China due to domestic political pressures until the 1960s.

ISBN: 0496916963Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017399
Political Science, International Law and Relations.

Structural explanation of alliance: United States-China relations, 1949--1972.
LDR:03125nmm 2200325 4500 001 1840533
005 20050721104656.5
008 130614s2005 eng d
020 $a 0496916963
035 $a (UnM)AAI3158699
035 $a AAI3158699
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Choi, Wooseon. $3 1928863
245 1 0 $a Structural explanation of alliance: United States-China relations, 1949--1972.
300 $a 200 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 65-12, Section: A, page: 4709.
500 $a Adviser: John Mearsheimer.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Chicago, 2005.
520 $a My dissertation explores the alliance relationship between the U.S. and China during 1949--1972. The conventional wisdom held by many realists is that during the early Cold War period, the U.S. should have formed an alliance with China against the stronger Soviet power in Asia as it did in 1972. However, they argue, the U.S. had irrationally pursued a confrontational policy toward China due to domestic political pressures until the 1960s.
520 $a In my dissertation, I present a structural explanation that counters the domestic explanation. From late 1949, in the face of strong domestic pressures, the Truman administration persistently pursued a policy to form an alliance with China to improve the U.S. position in the bipolar competition. However, this policy was not feasible for structural reasons. In global balance and especially in Asia, the U.S. maintained its superiority in bipolarity on the basis of its greater strategic and economic capabilities. In these circumstances, China was forced to ally with the Soviet Union to balance the stronger U.S. power.
520 $a During the 1950s, China kept balancing the stronger U.S. with its Soviet ally. And the Eisenhower administration pursued a tough containment to reduce the relative power growth of China. This inimical relations was maintained in the 1960s as China continued to balance the stronger U.S.
520 $a In 1972, an alliance between the U.S. and China was formed. By the late 1960s, the Soviet Union upset the regional balance by building up its conventional and nuclear forces in Asia while reaching parity with the U.S. in global balance. This structural change compelled China to seek an ally to balance the stronger Soviet power in Asia. As a consequence, the U.S. and China formed an alliance to check the Soviet dominance in Asia in spite of strong political and ideological constraints.
520 $a Thus my study finds that the alliance relationships between the U.S. and China before and after 1972 are explained by power structures. Theoretically, these hard cases vindicate the balance of power theory by showing how powerfully the distributions of capabilities shape the alliance choices and their outcomes under anarchy.
590 $a School code: 0330.
650 4 $a Political Science, International Law and Relations. $3 1017399
650 4 $a History, Modern. $3 516334
690 $a 0616
690 $a 0582
710 2 0 $a The University of Chicago. $3 1017389
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 65-12A.
790 1 0 $a Mearsheimer, John, $e advisor
790 $a 0330
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2005
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3158699