東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Theoretical and experimental foundat...

Suehnel, Sabine Karin.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Theoretical and experimental foundations in the work of Milton H. Erickson: The missing dimension.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Theoretical and experimental foundations in the work of Milton H. Erickson: The missing dimension./
作者:	Suehnel, Sabine Karin.
面頁冊數:	57 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 40-04, page: 1080.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International40-04.
標題:	Psychology, Clinical. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1407674
ISBN:	0493502742

Theoretical and experimental foundations in the work of Milton H. Erickson: The missing dimension.
Suehnel, Sabine Karin.

Theoretical and experimental foundations in the work of Milton H. Erickson: The missing dimension. - 57 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 40-04, page: 1080.

Thesis (M.A.)--Saybrook Graduate School and Research Center, 2001.

Milton H. Erickson is venerated within the psychotherapeutic counter-culture as the most significant influence in clinical hypnotherapy in the twentieth century. The followers of Erickson's work suggest that the reasons for this influence are his innovative hypnotic techniques and the widespread clinical application of these practices. This thesis corrects this misrepresentation by comparing the clinical literature with Erickson's own complete works. The conclusion is that Erickson himself perceived techniques as unimportant. Instead, he created his methods of induction spontaneously and idiosyncratically out of the unique understandings of each subject's inner world of meanings. The true influence of his work, as he understood it, was an a-theoretical approach towards concepts such as methods of induction, the unconscious, and the self. Consequently, Erickson aligned himself with no particular school of thought and also chose not to construct his own theoretical system to explain the effects of hypnosis. Rather, he always remained focused on the internal experience of the individual, which was different from person to person. Further, this analysis reveals that Erickson studied deep trance states experimentally in various hospital settings in order to understand hypnosis from a scientific viewpoint. In contrast, Erickson found that light trances were sufficient in his private practice for the treatment of most clinical problems. His followers, because of their exclusive focus on clinical application have overlooked this distinction between the requirements for research versus therapeutic work. The entire range of Erickson's clinical and experimental studies must be considered for a more complete understanding of where he needs to be placed within the larger field of hypnotherapy.

ISBN: 0493502742Subjects--Topical Terms:

524864
Psychology, Clinical.

Theoretical and experimental foundations in the work of Milton H. Erickson: The missing dimension.
LDR:02710nmm 2200277 4500 001 1840260
005 20050714101558.5
008 130614s2001 eng d
020 $a 0493502742
035 $a (UnM)AAI1407674
035 $a AAI1407674
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Suehnel, Sabine Karin. $3 1928602
245 1 0 $a Theoretical and experimental foundations in the work of Milton H. Erickson: The missing dimension.
300 $a 57 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 40-04, page: 1080.
500 $a Chair: Eugene Taylor.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--Saybrook Graduate School and Research Center, 2001.
520 $a Milton H. Erickson is venerated within the psychotherapeutic counter-culture as the most significant influence in clinical hypnotherapy in the twentieth century. The followers of Erickson's work suggest that the reasons for this influence are his innovative hypnotic techniques and the widespread clinical application of these practices. This thesis corrects this misrepresentation by comparing the clinical literature with Erickson's own complete works. The conclusion is that Erickson himself perceived techniques as unimportant. Instead, he created his methods of induction spontaneously and idiosyncratically out of the unique understandings of each subject's inner world of meanings. The true influence of his work, as he understood it, was an a-theoretical approach towards concepts such as methods of induction, the unconscious, and the self. Consequently, Erickson aligned himself with no particular school of thought and also chose not to construct his own theoretical system to explain the effects of hypnosis. Rather, he always remained focused on the internal experience of the individual, which was different from person to person. Further, this analysis reveals that Erickson studied deep trance states experimentally in various hospital settings in order to understand hypnosis from a scientific viewpoint. In contrast, Erickson found that light trances were sufficient in his private practice for the treatment of most clinical problems. His followers, because of their exclusive focus on clinical application have overlooked this distinction between the requirements for research versus therapeutic work. The entire range of Erickson's clinical and experimental studies must be considered for a more complete understanding of where he needs to be placed within the larger field of hypnotherapy.
590 $a School code: 0795.
650 4 $a Psychology, Clinical. $3 524864
650 4 $a Psychology, Personality. $3 1017585
690 $a 0622
690 $a 0625
710 2 0 $a Saybrook Graduate School and Research Center. $3 1253238
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 40-04.
790 1 0 $a Taylor, Eugene, $e advisor
790 $a 0795
791 $a M.A.
792 $a 2001
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1407674