東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The relationship between male restri...

Wester, Stephen Robert.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The relationship between male restricted emotionality and perceptions of counselor supervision.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The relationship between male restricted emotionality and perceptions of counselor supervision./
作者:	Wester, Stephen Robert.
面頁冊數:	101 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 61-08, Section: B, page: 4436.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International61-08B.
標題:	Psychology, Clinical. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9984507
ISBN:	0599908548

The relationship between male restricted emotionality and perceptions of counselor supervision.
Wester, Stephen Robert.

The relationship between male restricted emotionality and perceptions of counselor supervision. - 101 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 61-08, Section: B, page: 4436.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Florida, 2000.

This study examined the impact of the male gender role conflict pattern known as restricted emotionality on counselor supervision. Two hundred sixteen of the 540 psychology internship sites listed in the 1998--99 edition of the Association of Psychology Postdoctoral and Internship Centers directory were randomly selected to participate in this study. Of these, 134 (63%) returned an enclosed postcard indicating that they had distributed the study materials to 253 male interns and male practicum students. Of those 253 individuals, 103 (41%) returned the dependent measures. Hypothesis 1, that male supervisees experiencing more restricted emotionality will report lower self-efficacy as a counselor, a poorer perception of the quality of supervisory working alliance, and lower satisfaction with the supervision, was tested using a Pearson Product Moment correlational analysis. Hypothesis 2 contained two parts. First, male supervisees experiencing more restricted emotionality will express less satisfaction with the supervision, lower self-efficacy as a counselor, and a negative perception of the supervisory working alliance when they are paired with a supervisor whom they perceive as having a more affective and interpersonal style. Second, male supervisees experiencing more restricted emotionality will express more satisfaction with the supervision, greater feelings of self-efficacy as a counselor, and a positive perception of the supervisory working alliance when they are paired with a supervisor whom they perceive as having a more instrumental and task-oriented style. Both parts of Hypothesis 2 were tested using three independent multiple regression analyses. The Restricted Emotionality subscale of the Gender Role Conflict Scale, the Task Oriented and Interpersonally Sensitive subscales of the Supervisor Styles Inventory, and an overall interaction term representing the combination of restricted emotionality and supervisor style were classified as predictor variables. The Counselor Self-Efficacy Inventory, the Satisfaction with Supervision questionnaire, and the Rapport subscale of the Supervisory Working Alliance Inventory were classified as criterion variables. Both Hypothesis 1 and Hypothesis 2 were not supported, suggesting that neither restricted emotionality nor the interaction of restricted emotionality and supervisor style have an impact on perceptions of the supervisory working alliance, satisfaction with supervision, and feelings of counseling self-efficacy.

ISBN: 0599908548Subjects--Topical Terms:

524864
Psychology, Clinical.

The relationship between male restricted emotionality and perceptions of counselor supervision.
LDR:03411nmm 2200277 4500 001 1838739
005 20050526085855.5
008 130614s2000 eng d
020 $a 0599908548
035 $a (UnM)AAI9984507
035 $a AAI9984507
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Wester, Stephen Robert. $3 1927152
245 1 4 $a The relationship between male restricted emotionality and perceptions of counselor supervision.
300 $a 101 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 61-08, Section: B, page: 4436.
500 $a Chair: James Archer, Jr.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Florida, 2000.
520 $a This study examined the impact of the male gender role conflict pattern known as restricted emotionality on counselor supervision. Two hundred sixteen of the 540 psychology internship sites listed in the 1998--99 edition of the Association of Psychology Postdoctoral and Internship Centers directory were randomly selected to participate in this study. Of these, 134 (63%) returned an enclosed postcard indicating that they had distributed the study materials to 253 male interns and male practicum students. Of those 253 individuals, 103 (41%) returned the dependent measures. Hypothesis 1, that male supervisees experiencing more restricted emotionality will report lower self-efficacy as a counselor, a poorer perception of the quality of supervisory working alliance, and lower satisfaction with the supervision, was tested using a Pearson Product Moment correlational analysis. Hypothesis 2 contained two parts. First, male supervisees experiencing more restricted emotionality will express less satisfaction with the supervision, lower self-efficacy as a counselor, and a negative perception of the supervisory working alliance when they are paired with a supervisor whom they perceive as having a more affective and interpersonal style. Second, male supervisees experiencing more restricted emotionality will express more satisfaction with the supervision, greater feelings of self-efficacy as a counselor, and a positive perception of the supervisory working alliance when they are paired with a supervisor whom they perceive as having a more instrumental and task-oriented style. Both parts of Hypothesis 2 were tested using three independent multiple regression analyses. The Restricted Emotionality subscale of the Gender Role Conflict Scale, the Task Oriented and Interpersonally Sensitive subscales of the Supervisor Styles Inventory, and an overall interaction term representing the combination of restricted emotionality and supervisor style were classified as predictor variables. The Counselor Self-Efficacy Inventory, the Satisfaction with Supervision questionnaire, and the Rapport subscale of the Supervisory Working Alliance Inventory were classified as criterion variables. Both Hypothesis 1 and Hypothesis 2 were not supported, suggesting that neither restricted emotionality nor the interaction of restricted emotionality and supervisor style have an impact on perceptions of the supervisory working alliance, satisfaction with supervision, and feelings of counseling self-efficacy.
590 $a School code: 0070.
650 4 $a Psychology, Clinical. $3 524864
650 4 $a Psychology, Experimental. $3 517106
690 $a 0622
690 $a 0623
710 2 0 $a University of Florida. $3 718949
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 61-08B.
790 1 0 $a Archer, James, Jr., $e advisor
790 $a 0070
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2000
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9984507