東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The Perceived Disability Scale: Norm...

Weber, Christopher John.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The Perceived Disability Scale: Normative development and clinical utility.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Perceived Disability Scale: Normative development and clinical utility./
作者:	Weber, Christopher John.
面頁冊數:	55 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 63-04, Section: B, page: 2104.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International63-04B.
標題:	Psychology, Psychobiology. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3051408
ISBN:	0493658203

The Perceived Disability Scale: Normative development and clinical utility.
Weber, Christopher John.

The Perceived Disability Scale: Normative development and clinical utility. - 55 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 63-04, Section: B, page: 2104.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Illinois Institute of Technology, 2002.

The Perceived Disability Scale (PDS) is a brief, self-report instrument developed to assess a patient's self-perception of his or her disability level. It is important to assess patient perceptions regarding their disability as a means of determining the degree to which cognitive factors may be influencing their disability level. The ten items composing the PDS were designed to provide inter-item consistency with single items measuring congruous content, thus allowing for discriminating responses. One use of this instrument is to identify patients who perceive particularly high or low levels of perceived disability when compared to others within their same patient population as well as across other disabled or rehabilitation populations. The purpose of this study is to report preliminary norms for the PDS and make initial comparisons to evaluate the clinical utility of the PDS in practice. Three hundred forty nine outpatients suffering from chronic pain (including headache and low back pain), spinal cord injury, or erectile dysfunction completed the PDS. Preliminary findings indicated that the PDS is a reliable and valid measure of perceived disability, and that there are significant PDS differences between all groups, F (4, 344) = 18.0, p < .01. Furthermore, patients with pending litigation and patients receiving workman's compensation income reported significantly higher PDS scores, F (2, 342) = 19.8, p < .01, and litigation, F (2, 334) = 11.1, p < .01. Additional research is needed to develop a wider normative database, and also address how PDS scores are influenced by many things, including cognitive distortion, client/staff relations, psychological treatment history, and medication use. Treatment implications of an individual's PDS score will unfold as additional research is completed.

ISBN: 0493658203Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017821
Psychology, Psychobiology.

The Perceived Disability Scale: Normative development and clinical utility.
LDR:02773nmm 2200301 4500 001 1836730
005 20050315121039.5
008 130614s2002 eng d
020 $a 0493658203
035 $a (UnM)AAI3051408
035 $a AAI3051408
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Weber, Christopher John. $3 1925198
245 1 4 $a The Perceived Disability Scale: Normative development and clinical utility.
300 $a 55 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 63-04, Section: B, page: 2104.
500 $a Adviser: Robert C. Schleser.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Illinois Institute of Technology, 2002.
520 $a The Perceived Disability Scale (PDS) is a brief, self-report instrument developed to assess a patient's self-perception of his or her disability level. It is important to assess patient perceptions regarding their disability as a means of determining the degree to which cognitive factors may be influencing their disability level. The ten items composing the PDS were designed to provide inter-item consistency with single items measuring congruous content, thus allowing for discriminating responses. One use of this instrument is to identify patients who perceive particularly high or low levels of perceived disability when compared to others within their same patient population as well as across other disabled or rehabilitation populations. The purpose of this study is to report preliminary norms for the PDS and make initial comparisons to evaluate the clinical utility of the PDS in practice. Three hundred forty nine outpatients suffering from chronic pain (including headache and low back pain), spinal cord injury, or erectile dysfunction completed the PDS. Preliminary findings indicated that the PDS is a reliable and valid measure of perceived disability, and that there are significant PDS differences between all groups, F (4, 344) = 18.0, p < .01. Furthermore, patients with pending litigation and patients receiving workman's compensation income reported significantly higher PDS scores, F (2, 342) = 19.8, p < .01, and litigation, F (2, 334) = 11.1, p < .01. Additional research is needed to develop a wider normative database, and also address how PDS scores are influenced by many things, including cognitive distortion, client/staff relations, psychological treatment history, and medication use. Treatment implications of an individual's PDS score will unfold as additional research is completed.
590 $a School code: 0091.
650 4 $a Psychology, Psychobiology. $3 1017821
650 4 $a Health Sciences, Rehabilitation and Therapy. $3 1017926
650 4 $a Health Sciences, Occupational Health and Safety. $3 1017799
650 4 $a Psychology, Psychometrics. $3 1017742
690 $a 0349
690 $a 0382
690 $a 0354
690 $a 0632
710 2 0 $a Illinois Institute of Technology. $3 1018749
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 63-04B.
790 1 0 $a Schleser, Robert C., $e advisor
790 $a 0091
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2002
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3051408