東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Does it work for everyone? An exami...

Gerhardt, Megan Margaret Werner.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Does it work for everyone? An examination of the moderating effects of goal orientation, affectivity, and situational constraints on self-efficacy development.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Does it work for everyone? An examination of the moderating effects of goal orientation, affectivity, and situational constraints on self-efficacy development./
作者:	Gerhardt, Megan Margaret Werner.
面頁冊數:	116 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-04, Section: B, page: 1930.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International64-04B.
標題:	Psychology, Industrial. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3087630
ISBN:	0496354005

Does it work for everyone? An examination of the moderating effects of goal orientation, affectivity, and situational constraints on self-efficacy development.
Gerhardt, Megan Margaret Werner.

Does it work for everyone? An examination of the moderating effects of goal orientation, affectivity, and situational constraints on self-efficacy development. - 116 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-04, Section: B, page: 1930.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Iowa, 2003.

The current study examined the potential moderating effects of individual (goal orientation and affectivity) and situational factors (situational constraints) on the development of self-efficacy. Participants were 321 undergraduate students at a large Midwestern university. Multiple moderated regression techniques were used to test all hypotheses.

ISBN: 0496354005Subjects--Topical Terms:

520063
Psychology, Industrial.

Does it work for everyone? An examination of the moderating effects of goal orientation, affectivity, and situational constraints on self-efficacy development.
LDR:03607nmm 2200337 4500 001 1836510
005 20050315120458.5
008 130614s2003 eng d
020 $a 0496354005
035 $a (UnM)AAI3087630
035 $a AAI3087630
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Gerhardt, Megan Margaret Werner. $3 1924988
245 1 0 $a Does it work for everyone? An examination of the moderating effects of goal orientation, affectivity, and situational constraints on self-efficacy development.
300 $a 116 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-04, Section: B, page: 1930.
500 $a Supervisors: Murray R. Barrick; Kenneth G. Brown.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Iowa, 2003.
520 $a The current study examined the potential moderating effects of individual (goal orientation and affectivity) and situational factors (situational constraints) on the development of self-efficacy. Participants were 321 undergraduate students at a large Midwestern university. Multiple moderated regression techniques were used to test all hypotheses.
520 $a Results indicated that there was an overall increase in self-efficacy as a result of the self-management training. Closer examination of the results found a much greater increase in self-efficacy for those who were initially lower in self-efficacy.
520 $a Specific results indicated that as hypothesized, those lower in performance goal orientation experienced greater increases in self-efficacy as a result of a training program than those higher in performance goal orientation (DeltaR2 = .02). In contrast to predicted hypotheses, those lower in mastery goal orientation experienced greater increases in self-efficacy than those higher in mastery goal orientation (DeltaR2 = .04). The study did not support the presence of predicted interaction effects for positive and negative affectivity. However, main effects were found for both positive and negative affectivity (DeltaR2 = .02 (PA) and .01 (NA)). Situational constraints were examined using two scales. Exploratory analyses of the situational constraints measure revealed a formatting response effect. In this study, two factors were extracted: study environment situational constraints and necessary resources situational constraints. Results indicated that contrary to hypotheses, those higher in study environment and necessary resources situational constraints experienced greater increases in self-efficacy as a result of a training program as compared to those lower in study environment and necessary resources situational constraints (DeltaR2 = .01 (SESC) and .01 (NRSC)), providing evidence that self-management training may be more successful in increasing the academic self-efficacy of those who experience a greater amount of situational constraints.
520 $a This study provides evidence that the dynamism of self-efficacy is a more complex issue than previously thought. Self-efficacy development does not occur similarly for all people in all situations, and may be impacted by the presence of certain individual or situational characteristics. Future research needs to devote further consideration to what additional individual and situational factors may impact self-efficacy development.
590 $a School code: 0096.
650 4 $a Psychology, Industrial. $3 520063
650 4 $a Psychology, Personality. $3 1017585
650 4 $a Business Administration, Management. $3 626628
690 $a 0624
690 $a 0625
690 $a 0454
710 2 0 $a The University of Iowa. $3 1017439
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 64-04B.
790 1 0 $a Barrick, Murray R., $e advisor
790 1 0 $a Brown, Kenneth G., $e advisor
790 $a 0096
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2003
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3087630