東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Canfield Learning Style Inventory as...

White, Linda H.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Canfield Learning Style Inventory as a predictor of success in distance learning program versus traditional learning program in an associate degree nursing program.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Canfield Learning Style Inventory as a predictor of success in distance learning program versus traditional learning program in an associate degree nursing program./
作者:	White, Linda H.
面頁冊數:	131 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 68-01, Section: B, page: 0186.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International68-01B.
標題:	Education, Tests and Measurements. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3250958

Canfield Learning Style Inventory as a predictor of success in distance learning program versus traditional learning program in an associate degree nursing program.
White, Linda H.

Canfield Learning Style Inventory as a predictor of success in distance learning program versus traditional learning program in an associate degree nursing program. - 131 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 68-01, Section: B, page: 0186.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Touro University International, 2007.

The purpose of this quasi-experimental nonequivalent group post-test only study was to compare the student learning styles of a distance learning nursing class (N=37) with an equivalent on-campus class (N=95). The Canfield Learning Style Inventory (CLSI) was administered to determine student-learning preferences in four major learning style categories. The data showed that students who enrolled in the distance learning nursing courses did not significantly demonstrate any learning style characteristics different from students in the equivalent on-campus nursing courses. Furthermore, the data showed that there were no differences in the National League of Nursing (NLN) exam scores between the two groups of students.Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017589
Education, Tests and Measurements.

Canfield Learning Style Inventory as a predictor of success in distance learning program versus traditional learning program in an associate degree nursing program.
LDR:02400nmm 2200301 4500 001 1834609
005 20071127114953.5
008 130610s2007 eng d
035 $a (UMI)AAI3250958
035 $a AAI3250958
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a White, Linda H. $3 1923249
245 1 0 $a Canfield Learning Style Inventory as a predictor of success in distance learning program versus traditional learning program in an associate degree nursing program.
300 $a 131 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 68-01, Section: B, page: 0186.
500 $a Adviser: Frank Gomez.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Touro University International, 2007.
520 $a The purpose of this quasi-experimental nonequivalent group post-test only study was to compare the student learning styles of a distance learning nursing class (N=37) with an equivalent on-campus class (N=95). The Canfield Learning Style Inventory (CLSI) was administered to determine student-learning preferences in four major learning style categories. The data showed that students who enrolled in the distance learning nursing courses did not significantly demonstrate any learning style characteristics different from students in the equivalent on-campus nursing courses. Furthermore, the data showed that there were no differences in the National League of Nursing (NLN) exam scores between the two groups of students.
520 $a Because there were no differences in the NLN exam scores between the two groups, the distance learning nursing option was found to be as effective as the traditional nursing option. Faculty, who are considering developing a distance-learning course based on a traditional course, should consider administering a student learning style inventory to both their distance and traditional students. Knowledge of student learning preferences can aid faculty in class preparation, designing class delivery methods, choosing appropriate technologies, and developing sensitivity to differing student learning preferences within the most appropriate learning education environment.
590 $a School code: 1421.
650 4 $a Education, Tests and Measurements. $3 1017589
650 4 $a Health Sciences, Education. $3 1017921
650 4 $a Health Sciences, Nursing. $3 1017798
650 4 $a Education, Technology. $3 1017498
690 $a 0288
690 $a 0350
690 $a 0569
690 $a 0710
710 2 0 $a Touro University International. $3 1023252
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 68-01B.
790 1 0 $a Gomez, Frank, $e advisor
790 $a 1421
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2007
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3250958