東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

A sociological history of salarymen ...

Shibata, Yoshio.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

A sociological history of salarymen and Japan's modernization .

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	A sociological history of salarymen and Japan's modernization ./
作者:	Shibata, Yoshio.
面頁冊數:	631 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 67-12, Section: A, page: 4720.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International67-12A.
標題:	Anthropology, Cultural. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3245060

A sociological history of salarymen and Japan's modernization .
Shibata, Yoshio.

A sociological history of salarymen and Japan's modernization . - 631 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 67-12, Section: A, page: 4720.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--City University of New York, 2007.

The Japanese "salaryman" (corporate businessman) has been known for his hard-working orientation and now for "karoshi" (death from overwork) that became epidemic since the latter part of the 1980s. Why do salarymen work as hard as they do? Refusing culturalist explanations, this dissertation adopts a guiding hypothesis that the salaryman existence is a product of Japan's modernization. The two historical and theoretical foci of this genealogical study of salaryman subjectivity are analysis of modern technologies of power from Foucauldian perspective and of modern competitive games from Bourdieu's perspective. The Japanese state since the late 19th century tried to discipline the population in gender specific ways and developed various disciplinary power mechanisms, which were subsequently transplanted onto corporations during the wartime period. On the other hand, the social imagery of "salaryman" lifestyle marked by westernization of consumption and modern gender division of labor emerged as an ideal family lifestyle since the 1920s. In the early postwar period, unions, with their aspiration to realize salaryman lifestyle, struggled with managers and resulting compromises were institutionalized into so-called "Japanese management system." This institutionalized arrangement includes long-term competition among salarymen within the internal labor market of each corporation under an evaluation system that works as "panopticon." At the same time, cultural nationalist discourses that define the Japanese salarymen as "collectivists" have been utilized as a behavioral norm. To the extent that salarymen aspire to promotion, they have to strategically subordinate themselves to the panoptic gaze of evaluation. Thus salarymen have been involved in the game of showing "loyalty to the corporation," which is a very individualistic game despite the "collectivist" appearances. Their aspiration for promotion has been strengthened by their desire to realize "middle status" consumption lifestyle and the unified aspiration in work and consumption, coupled with the working of the disciplinary power, leads some salarymen to karoshi. Based on these analyses, I also argue that the current neo-liberal reforms do not mean a change from "collectivism" to "individualism": the reforms are bringing an intensification of disciplinary power and individualistic competition that were already part of the (old) Japanese management system.Subjects--Topical Terms:

735016
Anthropology, Cultural.

A sociological history of salarymen and Japan's modernization .
LDR:03348nmm 2200289 4500 001 1833816
005 20071114145403.5
008 130610s2007 eng d
035 $a (UMI)AAI3245060
035 $a AAI3245060
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Shibata, Yoshio. $3 1922499
245 1 2 $a A sociological history of salarymen and Japan's modernization .
300 $a 631 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 67-12, Section: A, page: 4720.
500 $a Adviser: Catherine B. Silver.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--City University of New York, 2007.
520 $a The Japanese "salaryman" (corporate businessman) has been known for his hard-working orientation and now for "karoshi" (death from overwork) that became epidemic since the latter part of the 1980s. Why do salarymen work as hard as they do? Refusing culturalist explanations, this dissertation adopts a guiding hypothesis that the salaryman existence is a product of Japan's modernization. The two historical and theoretical foci of this genealogical study of salaryman subjectivity are analysis of modern technologies of power from Foucauldian perspective and of modern competitive games from Bourdieu's perspective. The Japanese state since the late 19th century tried to discipline the population in gender specific ways and developed various disciplinary power mechanisms, which were subsequently transplanted onto corporations during the wartime period. On the other hand, the social imagery of "salaryman" lifestyle marked by westernization of consumption and modern gender division of labor emerged as an ideal family lifestyle since the 1920s. In the early postwar period, unions, with their aspiration to realize salaryman lifestyle, struggled with managers and resulting compromises were institutionalized into so-called "Japanese management system." This institutionalized arrangement includes long-term competition among salarymen within the internal labor market of each corporation under an evaluation system that works as "panopticon." At the same time, cultural nationalist discourses that define the Japanese salarymen as "collectivists" have been utilized as a behavioral norm. To the extent that salarymen aspire to promotion, they have to strategically subordinate themselves to the panoptic gaze of evaluation. Thus salarymen have been involved in the game of showing "loyalty to the corporation," which is a very individualistic game despite the "collectivist" appearances. Their aspiration for promotion has been strengthened by their desire to realize "middle status" consumption lifestyle and the unified aspiration in work and consumption, coupled with the working of the disciplinary power, leads some salarymen to karoshi. Based on these analyses, I also argue that the current neo-liberal reforms do not mean a change from "collectivism" to "individualism": the reforms are bringing an intensification of disciplinary power and individualistic competition that were already part of the (old) Japanese management system.
590 $a School code: 0046.
650 4 $a Anthropology, Cultural. $3 735016
650 4 $a History, Asia, Australia and Oceania. $3 626624
650 4 $a Sociology, Industrial and Labor Relations. $3 1017858
650 4 $a Sociology, Social Structure and Development. $3 1017425
690 $a 0326
690 $a 0332
690 $a 0629
690 $a 0700
710 2 0 $a City University of New York. $3 1018111
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 67-12A.
790 1 0 $a Silver, Catherine B., $e advisor
790 $a 0046
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2007
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3245060