東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Foucault's techniques of power in st...

McGinn, Kathleen A.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Foucault's techniques of power in street-level organizations.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Foucault's techniques of power in street-level organizations./
作者:	McGinn, Kathleen A.
面頁冊數:	242 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 67-02, Section: A, page: 0714.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International67-02A.
標題:	Political Science, Public Administration. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3207263
ISBN:	9780542563041

Foucault's techniques of power in street-level organizations.
McGinn, Kathleen A.

Foucault's techniques of power in street-level organizations. - 242 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 67-02, Section: A, page: 0714.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Florida Atlantic University, 2006.

This study uses Foucault's (1979, 1983, 1995) theoretical work as a guide in examining relation of power and resistance within the unique context of street-level bureaucracies (Lipsky, 1980). It explores relationships by asking how employees and managers are objectified within street level organizations, if there are any similarities in objectifications across organizations providing different government services, and how these objectifications intersect within relations of power and resistance.

ISBN: 9780542563041Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017438
Political Science, Public Administration.

Foucault's techniques of power in street-level organizations.
LDR:03385nmm 2200301 4500 001 1833789
005 20071114145346.5
008 130610s2006 eng d
020 $a 9780542563041
035 $a (UMI)AAI3207263
035 $a AAI3207263
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a McGinn, Kathleen A. $3 1922472
245 1 0 $a Foucault's techniques of power in street-level organizations.
300 $a 242 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 67-02, Section: A, page: 0714.
500 $a Adviser: Hugh T. Miller.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Florida Atlantic University, 2006.
520 $a This study uses Foucault's (1979, 1983, 1995) theoretical work as a guide in examining relation of power and resistance within the unique context of street-level bureaucracies (Lipsky, 1980). It explores relationships by asking how employees and managers are objectified within street level organizations, if there are any similarities in objectifications across organizations providing different government services, and how these objectifications intersect within relations of power and resistance.
520 $a As an artifact of the relations of power between street-level bureaucrats and managers, ten purposively selected collectively bargained contract documents from public organizations in Florida are analyzed in this research. Ethnographic Content Analysis (Altheide, 1996) was used to study the collective bargaining agreements selected, with phrases from the documents serving as the unit of analysis. Using Foucault's (1979, 1983a, 1995) descriptions of techniques of power as a guide, four specific protocol matrices were developed, tested and then used to collect and code phrases as illustrative of one or more techniques of power. The results of the analysis are first summarized using displays and matrices. Then, rich illustrations from the data is are discussed in detail, using Foucault's categories of normalization, individualization, panopticism and pastoralism as a framework for presentation.
520 $a Results of this research demonstrate that, in the collective bargaining agreements analyzed, both 'managers' and 'employees' are objectified in ways that were similar across all of the documents studied. Through techniques of power as theorized by Foucault, 'managers', 'employees', and 'union representatives' are produced, but also constrained as well. The collective bargaining agreements in this analysis serve to 'fix' relationships between these two objectifications that are discursively affirmed as unequal. Constrained by this 'reality', any potential for changing relationships between managers and employees through prescriptions that ask street-level bureaucrats to be 'leaders'; "responsible choice-makers" (Vinzant & Crothers, 1998, p. 154) rather than policy implementers simply carrying out management directives are largely futile. As persuasive as these ideas might be, within the context of this project it is impossible to think of employees in terms of 'leader', given the objectifications of 'employee' and 'manager' found in the documents analyzed.
590 $a School code: 0119.
650 4 $a Political Science, Public Administration. $3 1017438
650 4 $a Sociology, Industrial and Labor Relations. $3 1017858
690 $a 0617
690 $a 0629
710 2 0 $a Florida Atlantic University. $3 1017837
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 67-02A.
790 1 0 $a Miller, Hugh T., $e advisor
790 $a 0119
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2006
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3207263