東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Development of the Family Resilience...

Tucker Sixbey, Meggen.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Development of the Family Resilience Assessment Scale to identify family resilience constructs.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Development of the Family Resilience Assessment Scale to identify family resilience constructs./
作者:	Tucker Sixbey, Meggen.
面頁冊數:	181 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 67-01, Section: A, page: 0106.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International67-01A.
標題:	Education, Guidance and Counseling. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3204501
ISBN:	9780542505089

Development of the Family Resilience Assessment Scale to identify family resilience constructs.
Tucker Sixbey, Meggen.

Development of the Family Resilience Assessment Scale to identify family resilience constructs. - 181 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 67-01, Section: A, page: 0106.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Florida, 2005.

All too often conceptual models are promoted and described in the literature with little or no empirical evidence to support the beliefs. As there are multiple conceptual models, there is also a plethora of more than 1,000 marriage and family measures available for use in research and by therapists. However, finding a well-designed scale addressing specific constructs is difficult due to a multitude of circumstances.

ISBN: 9780542505089Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017740
Education, Guidance and Counseling.

Development of the Family Resilience Assessment Scale to identify family resilience constructs.
LDR:03093nmm 2200325 4500 001 1833031
005 20070822130612.5
008 130610s2005 eng d
020 $a 9780542505089
035 $a (UMI)AAI3204501
035 $a AAI3204501
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Tucker Sixbey, Meggen. $3 1921746
245 1 0 $a Development of the Family Resilience Assessment Scale to identify family resilience constructs.
300 $a 181 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 67-01, Section: A, page: 0106.
500 $a Adviser: Peter A. D. Sherrard.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Florida, 2005.
520 $a All too often conceptual models are promoted and described in the literature with little or no empirical evidence to support the beliefs. As there are multiple conceptual models, there is also a plethora of more than 1,000 marriage and family measures available for use in research and by therapists. However, finding a well-designed scale addressing specific constructs is difficult due to a multitude of circumstances.
520 $a One such conceptual model is the model of family resilience. This model proposes three-pronged approach to family resilience involving three over-arching constructs with each of the three major constructs having three sub-constructs. This study attempted to develop a valid and reliable instrument capable of measuring the model of family resilience.
520 $a This study involved a survey of a sample of 418 participants. Of the participants, 76.08% were female, 85.65% were Caucasian, and 37.80% held a bachelor's degree. A survey instrument, the Family Resilience Assessment Scale (FRAS), was developed to aid in understanding how families deal and cope with adversity and provide therapists with an assessment tool identifying resilience concepts.
520 $a After extensive statistical analyses, the findings demonstrate that a six factor structure most appropriately represents the construct of family resilience. This study found women, older adults, white individuals, and higher educated individuals to have statistically significant levels of family resilience on certain subscales. Additionally, individuals who believed their family connection to become closer after experiencing an adverse event showed statically significant results on all subscales and the total scale score.
520 $a Based on the findings of this study, future studies should continue empirical investigations on the FRAS, its psychometric properties, and validation instruments. Both significant findings and nonsignificant findings should be further investigated to lend to the credibility of the FRAS. Future studies may also wish to analyze the open-ended response question's answers as that process was beyond the scope of this study.
590 $a School code: 0070.
650 4 $a Education, Guidance and Counseling. $3 1017740
650 4 $a Psychology, Psychometrics. $3 1017742
690 $a 0519
690 $a 0632
710 2 0 $a University of Florida. $3 718949
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 67-01A.
790 1 0 $a Sherrard, Peter A. D., $e advisor
790 $a 0070
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2005
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3204501