東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Knowledge flow and value creation: I...

Yao, Beiqing (Emery).

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Knowledge flow and value creation: Integrating structural embeddedness and knowledge embeddedness in alliance networks.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Knowledge flow and value creation: Integrating structural embeddedness and knowledge embeddedness in alliance networks./
作者:	Yao, Beiqing (Emery).
面頁冊數:	126 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 67-06, Section: A, page: 2237.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International67-06A.
標題:	Sociology, Theory and Methods. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3224067
ISBN:	9780542750335

Knowledge flow and value creation: Integrating structural embeddedness and knowledge embeddedness in alliance networks.
Yao, Beiqing (Emery).

Knowledge flow and value creation: Integrating structural embeddedness and knowledge embeddedness in alliance networks. - 126 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 67-06, Section: A, page: 2237.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Pittsburgh, 2006.

Scholars in a variety of disciplines, including organizational theory, strategic management, and economics, have devoted substantial attention to the question: why are some firms more innovative than others? It has been largely accepted that when the knowledge base of an industry is both complex and expanding and the sources of expertise are widely dispersed, the locus of innovation will be found in networks of inter-organizational collaborations than individual firms. Strategy researchers have recently begun to explore how inter-firm networking affects organizational innovation performance, and reported intriguing yet conflicting findings. Drawing perspectives from strategic alliance, social networks, and technology innovation, I proposed an integrative framework to investigate the combined effects of a firm's network centrality and structural hole on organizational innovation performance. Furthermore, I examine the innovation performance both in terms of innovation rate and innovation value.

ISBN: 9780542750335Subjects--Topical Terms:

626625
Sociology, Theory and Methods.

Knowledge flow and value creation: Integrating structural embeddedness and knowledge embeddedness in alliance networks.
LDR:02686nmm 2200301 4500 001 1831191
005 20070507072406.5
008 130610s2006 eng d
020 $a 9780542750335
035 $a (UnM)AAI3224067
035 $a AAI3224067
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Yao, Beiqing (Emery). $3 1919997
245 1 0 $a Knowledge flow and value creation: Integrating structural embeddedness and knowledge embeddedness in alliance networks.
300 $a 126 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 67-06, Section: A, page: 2237.
500 $a Adviser: Susan McEvily.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Pittsburgh, 2006.
520 $a Scholars in a variety of disciplines, including organizational theory, strategic management, and economics, have devoted substantial attention to the question: why are some firms more innovative than others? It has been largely accepted that when the knowledge base of an industry is both complex and expanding and the sources of expertise are widely dispersed, the locus of innovation will be found in networks of inter-organizational collaborations than individual firms. Strategy researchers have recently begun to explore how inter-firm networking affects organizational innovation performance, and reported intriguing yet conflicting findings. Drawing perspectives from strategic alliance, social networks, and technology innovation, I proposed an integrative framework to investigate the combined effects of a firm's network centrality and structural hole on organizational innovation performance. Furthermore, I examine the innovation performance both in terms of innovation rate and innovation value.
520 $a I conducted a longitudinal study on a population of firms from 1990 to 1999 in pharmaceutical industry (SIC 2834). The results of the study indicate that: (1) Network centrality helps a firm to increase its rate of innovation, and structural hole helps to improve its value of innovation, while both effects are non-linear. (2) Network centrality positively moderates the relationship between structural hole and innovation value. (3) Structural hole negatively moderates the effect of network centrality on innovation rate. The joint effects suggest that firms with advantageous network positions are more capable of making wise technology selections and focusing their efforts on innovations of greater value.
590 $a School code: 0178.
650 4 $a Sociology, Theory and Methods. $3 626625
650 4 $a Business Administration, Management. $3 626628
650 4 $a Sociology, Organizational. $3 1018023
690 $a 0344
690 $a 0454
690 $a 0703
710 2 0 $a University of Pittsburgh. $3 958527
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 67-06A.
790 1 0 $a McEvily, Susan, $e advisor
790 $a 0178
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2006
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3224067