東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Faculty practice as scholarship in u...

Greenslade, Mary Victoria.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Faculty practice as scholarship in university schools of nursing.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Faculty practice as scholarship in university schools of nursing./
作者:	Greenslade, Mary Victoria.
面頁冊數:	256 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-10, Section: A, page: 3608.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International64-10A.
標題:	Education, Higher. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=NQ84865
ISBN:	9780612848658

Faculty practice as scholarship in university schools of nursing.
Greenslade, Mary Victoria.

Faculty practice as scholarship in university schools of nursing. - 256 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-10, Section: A, page: 3608.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Toronto (Canada), 2003.

This qualitative study explored perceptions of faculty members and nursing school administrators regarding clinical faculty practice in nursing education in two Ontario university schools of nursing. It explored how nurse educators valued the concept of faculty practice, their perceptions regarding their present practice as a contribution to scholarship, changes necessary to positively affect acceptance of practice as scholarship, and strategies for implementing changes.

ISBN: 9780612848658Subjects--Topical Terms:

543175
Education, Higher.

Faculty practice as scholarship in university schools of nursing.
LDR:03574nmm 2200325 4500 001 1829533
005 20061114131350.5
008 130610s2003 eng d
020 $a 9780612848658
035 $a (UnM)AAINQ84865
035 $a AAINQ84865
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Greenslade, Mary Victoria. $3 1918391
245 1 0 $a Faculty practice as scholarship in university schools of nursing.
300 $a 256 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-10, Section: A, page: 3608.
500 $a Adviser: Michael Skolnik.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Toronto (Canada), 2003.
520 $a This qualitative study explored perceptions of faculty members and nursing school administrators regarding clinical faculty practice in nursing education in two Ontario university schools of nursing. It explored how nurse educators valued the concept of faculty practice, their perceptions regarding their present practice as a contribution to scholarship, changes necessary to positively affect acceptance of practice as scholarship, and strategies for implementing changes.
520 $a Eighteen nurse educators participated in the study, two in administration and sixteen in teaching positions. Data were collected through audio-taped, unstructured, interviews on site at the selected universities. Participants were enabled to freely describe their experiences through the use of guiding questions. Further participant input was obtained by e-mail when additional exploration was required. Four major themes emerged: Views and Value of Faculty Practice, Stumbling Blocks to Clinical Faculty Practice, Getting Here, and Going Where?
520 $a Findings resulted in the development of an integrative framework of faculty practice and nursing scholarship in academe demonstrating the interrelationships between the four domains of nursing (administration, education, practice, and research) and Boyer's concept of scholarship (discovery, application, integration, and teaching). The study found that while faculty members believe all four domains are integral to the nursing profession and the teaching related to that profession, participants were frustrated that the discovery component of scholarship was valued so much more than the others. They expressed the view that the extent of emphasis that the university places on research as discovery and obtaining research funding leaves little room for faculty practice. They stated that faculty practice was hindered by 'lip-service' attention from faculty, lack of support from Senate, lack of consensus among faculty as to what constitutes faculty practice, lack of support by nursing school administration, and personal and professional costs associated with it. The gendered work of nursing was felt to marginalize scholarly endeavors of nurse educators with respect to the work of clinical faculty practice.
520 $a Further research is needed to determine scholarly outcomes of clinical faculty practice, develop criteria to link the scholarship outcomes of clinical faculty practice to the university's criteria for promotion and tenure, and to determine a means of facilitating these scholarship outcomes and recognizing the value of faculty practice in the criteria for promotion and tenure.
590 $a School code: 0779.
650 4 $a Education, Higher. $3 543175
650 4 $a Health Sciences, Nursing. $3 1017798
650 4 $a Health Sciences, Education. $3 1017921
690 $a 0745
690 $a 0569
690 $a 0350
710 2 0 $a University of Toronto (Canada). $3 1017674
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 64-10A.
790 1 0 $a Skolnik, Michael, $e advisor
790 $a 0779
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2003
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=NQ84865