東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The piper link: Money, control, and...

Shelly, Bryan Thomas.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The piper link: Money, control, and equity in public school finance.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The piper link: Money, control, and equity in public school finance./
作者:	Shelly, Bryan Thomas.
面頁冊數:	243 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-05, Section: A, page: 1943.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International66-05A.
標題:	Political Science, General. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3175874
ISBN:	9780542139017

The piper link: Money, control, and equity in public school finance.
Shelly, Bryan Thomas.

The piper link: Money, control, and equity in public school finance. - 243 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-05, Section: A, page: 1943.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Princeton University, 2005.

This dissertation examines the significance of localism as an obstacle to school finance reform. Opponents of equity-based school finance reform have argued that centralization of education funding at the state or national level will lead to centralization of other aspects of education governance and a corresponding weakening of local education decision making. Through multivariate regression analysis of multi-state data and comparative case studies of local school politics, the dissertation finds that state centralization of school financing does not lead to a centralization of other aspects of educational governance and does not reduce local policymaking authority. Why, then, have local control concerns played such a prominent part in finance reform debates? Through multivariate regression analysis of state-level public opinion data, the dissertation examines the factors that influence attitudes on reform. It fords that support for localism is influential not when people perceive a loss of local discretionary authority but when they believe their taxes will increase to increase funding to less affluent areas. The dissertation concludes that localism matters in school finance reform debates not because finance reform jeopardizes some strong commitment to local government but because affluent, primarily white suburbanites wish to preserve their relative privilege. More broadly, while these findings suggest it is possible to decentralize decision making while centralizing financing in order to achieve greater equity, such reform efforts are hampered by the preference of the affluent for localism as a mechanism for separating themselves from the problems of the poor. Thus this dissertation argues that efforts to decentralize policy governance have less to do with a desire to preserve the United States' traditional attachment to localized decision making than the desire of suburbanites to maintain both high levels of service for themselves and low taxes.

ISBN: 9780542139017Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017391
Political Science, General.

The piper link: Money, control, and equity in public school finance.
LDR:02867nmm 2200277 4500 001 1827886
005 20061228142219.5
008 130610s2005 eng d
020 $a 9780542139017
035 $a (UnM)AAI3175874
035 $a AAI3175874
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Shelly, Bryan Thomas. $3 1916801
245 1 4 $a The piper link: Money, control, and equity in public school finance.
300 $a 243 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-05, Section: A, page: 1943.
500 $a Chair: Michael Danielson.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Princeton University, 2005.
520 $a This dissertation examines the significance of localism as an obstacle to school finance reform. Opponents of equity-based school finance reform have argued that centralization of education funding at the state or national level will lead to centralization of other aspects of education governance and a corresponding weakening of local education decision making. Through multivariate regression analysis of multi-state data and comparative case studies of local school politics, the dissertation finds that state centralization of school financing does not lead to a centralization of other aspects of educational governance and does not reduce local policymaking authority. Why, then, have local control concerns played such a prominent part in finance reform debates? Through multivariate regression analysis of state-level public opinion data, the dissertation examines the factors that influence attitudes on reform. It fords that support for localism is influential not when people perceive a loss of local discretionary authority but when they believe their taxes will increase to increase funding to less affluent areas. The dissertation concludes that localism matters in school finance reform debates not because finance reform jeopardizes some strong commitment to local government but because affluent, primarily white suburbanites wish to preserve their relative privilege. More broadly, while these findings suggest it is possible to decentralize decision making while centralizing financing in order to achieve greater equity, such reform efforts are hampered by the preference of the affluent for localism as a mechanism for separating themselves from the problems of the poor. Thus this dissertation argues that efforts to decentralize policy governance have less to do with a desire to preserve the United States' traditional attachment to localized decision making than the desire of suburbanites to maintain both high levels of service for themselves and low taxes.
590 $a School code: 0181.
650 4 $a Political Science, General. $3 1017391
650 4 $a Education, Finance. $3 1020300
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0277
710 2 0 $a Princeton University. $3 645579
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 66-05A.
790 1 0 $a Danielson, Michael, $e advisor
790 $a 0181
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2005
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3175874