東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Survey of athletic training clinical...

Nasypany, Alan, Jr.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Survey of athletic training clinical education: Perceptions from the field.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Survey of athletic training clinical education: Perceptions from the field./
作者:	Nasypany, Alan, Jr.
面頁冊數:	122 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-09, Section: A, page: 3251.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International66-09A.
標題:	Education, Physical. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3191244
ISBN:	9780542337765

Survey of athletic training clinical education: Perceptions from the field.
Nasypany, Alan, Jr.

Survey of athletic training clinical education: Perceptions from the field. - 122 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-09, Section: A, page: 3251.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--West Virginia University, 2005.

The purpose of this study was to identify: (1) Who are ACIs; (2) What are the perceptions of the clinical education process since the implementation of the 2001 Proficiencies, Standards, and Guidelines; (3) What factors are most and least facilitating to the clinical education process; and (4) What factors should be first addressed to improve the clinical education process. Online surveys were sent to 298 Program Directors and they were asked to distribute them to ACIs in their programs. Two weeks later, the survey was posted on the Athletic Training Education Listserve. Two hundred and twelve surveys were returned. The results indicated that 205 (97%) of the ACIs sampled, identified this as an important topic for athletic training research the results also indicated that ACIs are generally satisfied with the implementation of the 2001 Proficiencies, Standards, and Guidelines. The ACIs that responded to the survey believed that personal factors within their control generally facilitated the clinical education process, while those institutional factors (e.g. time, documentation, etc.) facilitate less. Possibly the most important finding of this study is that although the implementation of the 2001 Proficiencies, Standards, and Guidelines was met with significant resistance from the ground level (practitioners), ACIs, currently feel reasonably satisfied with their ability to perform in the clinical education process. This is crucial in that the overall findings of this study were so positive especially when considering the top down nature of these changes to the Proficiencies, Standards, and Guidelines. Future research should examine the "less facilitating" factors and seek steps to improve these factors.

ISBN: 9780542337765Subjects--Topical Terms:

1018000
Education, Physical.

Survey of athletic training clinical education: Perceptions from the field.
LDR:02638nmm 2200289 4500 001 1826121
005 20061218074246.5
008 130610s2005 eng d
020 $a 9780542337765
035 $a (UnM)AAI3191244
035 $a AAI3191244
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Nasypany, Alan, Jr. $3 1915093
245 1 0 $a Survey of athletic training clinical education: Perceptions from the field.
300 $a 122 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-09, Section: A, page: 3251.
500 $a Chair: Andrew Hawkins.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--West Virginia University, 2005.
520 $a The purpose of this study was to identify: (1) Who are ACIs; (2) What are the perceptions of the clinical education process since the implementation of the 2001 Proficiencies, Standards, and Guidelines; (3) What factors are most and least facilitating to the clinical education process; and (4) What factors should be first addressed to improve the clinical education process. Online surveys were sent to 298 Program Directors and they were asked to distribute them to ACIs in their programs. Two weeks later, the survey was posted on the Athletic Training Education Listserve. Two hundred and twelve surveys were returned. The results indicated that 205 (97%) of the ACIs sampled, identified this as an important topic for athletic training research the results also indicated that ACIs are generally satisfied with the implementation of the 2001 Proficiencies, Standards, and Guidelines. The ACIs that responded to the survey believed that personal factors within their control generally facilitated the clinical education process, while those institutional factors (e.g. time, documentation, etc.) facilitate less. Possibly the most important finding of this study is that although the implementation of the 2001 Proficiencies, Standards, and Guidelines was met with significant resistance from the ground level (practitioners), ACIs, currently feel reasonably satisfied with their ability to perform in the clinical education process. This is crucial in that the overall findings of this study were so positive especially when considering the top down nature of these changes to the Proficiencies, Standards, and Guidelines. Future research should examine the "less facilitating" factors and seek steps to improve these factors.
590 $a School code: 0256.
650 4 $a Education, Physical. $3 1018000
650 4 $a Health Sciences, Rehabilitation and Therapy. $3 1017926
650 4 $a Health Sciences, General. $3 1017817
690 $a 0523
690 $a 0382
690 $a 0566
710 2 0 $a West Virginia University. $3 1017532
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 66-09A.
790 1 0 $a Hawkins, Andrew, $e advisor
790 $a 0256
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 2005
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3191244