東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

How do Judgments of Intention (JOIs)...

Scheck, Petra Anne.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

How do Judgments of Intention (JOIs) differ from Judgments of Learning (JOLs).

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	How do Judgments of Intention (JOIs) differ from Judgments of Learning (JOLs)./
作者:	Scheck, Petra Anne.
面頁冊數:	59 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-12, Section: B, page: 6945.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International66-12B.
標題:	Psychology, Cognitive. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3202598
ISBN:	9780542477195

How do Judgments of Intention (JOIs) differ from Judgments of Learning (JOLs).
Scheck, Petra Anne.

How do Judgments of Intention (JOIs) differ from Judgments of Learning (JOLs). - 59 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-12, Section: B, page: 6945.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Maryland, College Park, 2006.

The purpose of this research was to investigate whether metacognitive judgments for prospective memory (PM; also called Judgments of Intention - JOIs) differ from judgments of learning (JOLs). Specifically, this researcher tested whether JOIs exhibit the "delayed-JOL effect", in which JOLs made at a delay following study are more accurate predictors of performance than JOLs made immediately following study. Results from the first two experiments showed no delayed-JOI effect. In Experiments 3--5 a time-based paradigm was used to investigate whether the type of judgment prompt might explain this lack of delayed JOI effect. Results suggest that participants are able to make moderately accurate predictions of prospective memory (PM) performance and that delayed JOIs may be more accurate than immediate JOIs when prompted with a cue that does not include either the recognition nor recall target.

ISBN: 9780542477195Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017810
Psychology, Cognitive.

How do Judgments of Intention (JOIs) differ from Judgments of Learning (JOLs).
LDR:01809nmm 2200277 4500 001 1825441
005 20061211074631.5
008 130610s2006 eng d
020 $a 9780542477195
035 $a (UnM)AAI3202598
035 $a AAI3202598
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Scheck, Petra Anne. $3 1914449
245 1 0 $a How do Judgments of Intention (JOIs) differ from Judgments of Learning (JOLs).
300 $a 59 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-12, Section: B, page: 6945.
500 $a Chair: Thomas S. Wallsten.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Maryland, College Park, 2006.
520 $a The purpose of this research was to investigate whether metacognitive judgments for prospective memory (PM; also called Judgments of Intention - JOIs) differ from judgments of learning (JOLs). Specifically, this researcher tested whether JOIs exhibit the "delayed-JOL effect", in which JOLs made at a delay following study are more accurate predictors of performance than JOLs made immediately following study. Results from the first two experiments showed no delayed-JOI effect. In Experiments 3--5 a time-based paradigm was used to investigate whether the type of judgment prompt might explain this lack of delayed JOI effect. Results suggest that participants are able to make moderately accurate predictions of prospective memory (PM) performance and that delayed JOIs may be more accurate than immediate JOIs when prompted with a cue that does not include either the recognition nor recall target.
590 $a School code: 0117.
650 4 $a Psychology, Cognitive. $3 1017810
650 4 $a Psychology, Experimental. $3 517106
690 $a 0633
690 $a 0623
710 2 0 $a University of Maryland, College Park. $3 657686
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 66-12B.
790 1 0 $a Wallsten, Thomas S., $e advisor
790 $a 0117
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2006
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3202598