東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Clinical evaluation methods used by ...

Bantell, Mary D.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Clinical evaluation methods used by baccalaureate nursing educators in traditional and nontraditional clinical areas.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Clinical evaluation methods used by baccalaureate nursing educators in traditional and nontraditional clinical areas./
作者:	Bantell, Mary D.
面頁冊數:	90 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-01, Section: B, page: 0200.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International66-01B.
標題:	Health Sciences, Nursing. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3160596
ISBN:	9780496939367

Clinical evaluation methods used by baccalaureate nursing educators in traditional and nontraditional clinical areas.
Bantell, Mary D.

Clinical evaluation methods used by baccalaureate nursing educators in traditional and nontraditional clinical areas. - 90 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-01, Section: B, page: 0200.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--Columbia University Teachers College, 2005.

Traditionally, people who were in need of health care went to hospitals or clinics. The length of stay for individuals in hospitals generally lasted for as long as it took for their complete recovery. However, in the past twenty years there has been a progressive movement to provide health care from acute care settings to community-based centers.

ISBN: 9780496939367Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017798
Health Sciences, Nursing.

Clinical evaluation methods used by baccalaureate nursing educators in traditional and nontraditional clinical areas.
LDR:03323nmm 2200325 4500 001 1825133
005 20061206115420.5
008 130610s2005 eng d
020 $a 9780496939367
035 $a (UnM)AAI3160596
035 $a AAI3160596
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Bantell, Mary D. $3 1914156
245 1 0 $a Clinical evaluation methods used by baccalaureate nursing educators in traditional and nontraditional clinical areas.
300 $a 90 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-01, Section: B, page: 0200.
500 $a Sponsor: Kathleen O'Connell.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--Columbia University Teachers College, 2005.
520 $a Traditionally, people who were in need of health care went to hospitals or clinics. The length of stay for individuals in hospitals generally lasted for as long as it took for their complete recovery. However, in the past twenty years there has been a progressive movement to provide health care from acute care settings to community-based centers.
520 $a As a result of the changes in the delivery of health care, health care providers needed to become flexible with their clinical practice and acquire new skills. As nurses are an integral component of the health care team, nursing educators also moved some clinical experiences from acute care settings to community-based areas to better prepare students to meet the health care needs of the population.
520 $a The impetus of this research is based on the movement of nursing clinical practice to a broader community scope of practice. Evaluation of students is a valuable tool for assessing students' competencies and providing feedback for their growth and development as professional nurses. It was found that there was a void as to whether methods of evaluating students were different in traditional and nontraditional clinical areas. This research was conducted to establish the differences in clinical evaluation methods of baccalaureate nursing students used by nursing faculty in traditional and nontraditional clinical practice areas.
520 $a The Bantell Clinical Evaluation Survey was developed to elicit responses from faculty to describe the clinical evaluation methods used in these two clinical areas. This qualitative, descriptive research focused on responses from faculty who taught in the clinical area at baccalaureate programs in the states of New York, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania.
520 $a The results of this study demonstrated that faculty taught in a variety of clinical areas, both traditional and nontraditional. A larger number of the participants taught in traditional clinical areas. Faculty in this study described numerous models, theories, and methods they used to evaluate students in traditional and nontraditional clinical areas. There were few differences reported in the evaluation methods used in the two areas. Respondents most frequently reported using the same clinical evaluation methods in both traditional and nontraditional clinical areas.
590 $a School code: 0055.
650 4 $a Health Sciences, Nursing. $3 1017798
650 4 $a Health Sciences, Education. $3 1017921
690 $a 0569
690 $a 0350
710 2 0 $a Columbia University Teachers College. $3 1250841
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 66-01B.
790 1 0 $a O'Connell, Kathleen, $e advisor
790 $a 0055
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 2005
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3160596