東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Labeling policies and international ...

Gruere, Guillaume Pierre Adrien.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Labeling policies and international trade of genetically modified food (Canada, France, Japan).

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Labeling policies and international trade of genetically modified food (Canada, France, Japan)./
作者:	Gruere, Guillaume Pierre Adrien.
面頁冊數:	226 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-04, Section: A, page: 1441.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International66-04A.
標題:	Economics, Agricultural. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3171880
ISBN:	9780542085383

Labeling policies and international trade of genetically modified food (Canada, France, Japan).
Gruere, Guillaume Pierre Adrien.

Labeling policies and international trade of genetically modified food (Canada, France, Japan). - 226 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-04, Section: A, page: 1441.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Davis, 2005.

Many countries have adopted alternative labeling policies for genetically modified (GM) food. In this dissertation, I develop an economic model of the market effects of genetically modified food labeling policies. My main objective is to explain and to evaluate alternative GM food labeling policies of GM food, from an economic perspective.

ISBN: 9780542085383Subjects--Topical Terms:

626648
Economics, Agricultural.

Labeling policies and international trade of genetically modified food (Canada, France, Japan).
LDR:03303nmm 2200313 4500 001 1823433
005 20061130142445.5
008 130610s2005 eng d
020 $a 9780542085383
035 $a (UnM)AAI3171880
035 $a AAI3171880
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Gruere, Guillaume Pierre Adrien. $3 1912540
245 1 0 $a Labeling policies and international trade of genetically modified food (Canada, France, Japan).
300 $a 226 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-04, Section: A, page: 1441.
500 $a Advisers: Colin A. Carter; Y. Hossein Farzin.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Davis, 2005.
520 $a Many countries have adopted alternative labeling policies for genetically modified (GM) food. In this dissertation, I develop an economic model of the market effects of genetically modified food labeling policies. My main objective is to explain and to evaluate alternative GM food labeling policies of GM food, from an economic perspective.
520 $a In the first section of the dissertation, I conduct an empirical case study of the effects of voluntary labeling of non-GM food in Canada and mandatory labeling of GM food in France. I use this motivating example to build an analytical model of labeling regulations, focusing on food processors' and retailers' incentives to label or not. With this model, I show that voluntary and mandatory labeling results in different consumer choice outcomes and welfare effects. I show that the effects of these labeling policies depend on the per unit profit of GM versus non-GM food, on the market share of consumers willing to buy GM food, and on the type of food product (fresh versus processed).
520 $a In the second section, I try to explain international differences in GM food labeling policies. Using econometric regression analysis, I show that international trade factors and domestic production factors help explain labeling policy choices across countries. In particular, large GM crop producing countries avoid using mandatory labeling. Countries in Europe or those exporting GM soybeans, corn, or canola mainly to the European Union or corn to Japan are more likely to have mandatory or stringent labeling policies. Countries with no labeling regulations are likely to be less developed countries, who have ratified the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety.
520 $a In the third section, I study the economic effects of the international harmonization of labeling policies. Using a partial equilibrium model in an open economy, I simulate the case of GM wheat commercialization under different labeling scenarios. I find that all countries should prefer a harmonized labeling scheme to the current international heterogeneity of labeling regulations. However, harmonization of a voluntary labeling scheme would increase welfare in developing countries, whereas mandatory labeling harmonization may only benefit consumers and producers in countries opposed to GM crops.
590 $a School code: 0029.
650 4 $a Economics, Agricultural. $3 626648
690 $a 0503
710 2 0 $a University of California, Davis. $3 1018682
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 66-04A.
790 1 0 $a Carter, Colin A., $e advisor
790 1 0 $a Farzin, Y. Hossein, $e advisor
790 $a 0029
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2005
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3171880