東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

How peers influence ethical decision...

Joseph, Joshua.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

How peers influence ethical decision-making in work organizations: Revisiting the social dimension.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	How peers influence ethical decision-making in work organizations: Revisiting the social dimension./
作者:	Joseph, Joshua.
面頁冊數:	139 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 65-11, Section: A, page: 4367.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International65-11A.
標題:	Sociology, Social Structure and Development. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3152889
ISBN:	9780496135820

How peers influence ethical decision-making in work organizations: Revisiting the social dimension.
Joseph, Joshua.

How peers influence ethical decision-making in work organizations: Revisiting the social dimension. - 139 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 65-11, Section: A, page: 4367.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The American University, 2004.

Amid increasing revelations of improprieties in financial accounting, disclosure of health and safety information, and general public accountability among leading organizations, the need for research on ethical decision-making (EDM) has probably never been greater. Senior executives in organizations may "set the tone" for ethics, but their influence cannot fully explain how employees make ethical decisions. The social context for ethical practice in the workplace also depends upon regular social interactions among employee peers (coworkers).

ISBN: 9780496135820Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017425
Sociology, Social Structure and Development.

How peers influence ethical decision-making in work organizations: Revisiting the social dimension.
LDR:03381nmm 2200325 4500 001 1821242
005 20061115072948.5
008 130610s2004 eng d
020 $a 9780496135820
035 $a (UnM)AAI3152889
035 $a AAI3152889
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Joseph, Joshua. $3 1910434
245 1 0 $a How peers influence ethical decision-making in work organizations: Revisiting the social dimension.
300 $a 139 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 65-11, Section: A, page: 4367.
500 $a Chair: Esther Ngan-Ling Chow.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The American University, 2004.
520 $a Amid increasing revelations of improprieties in financial accounting, disclosure of health and safety information, and general public accountability among leading organizations, the need for research on ethical decision-making (EDM) has probably never been greater. Senior executives in organizations may "set the tone" for ethics, but their influence cannot fully explain how employees make ethical decisions. The social context for ethical practice in the workplace also depends upon regular social interactions among employee peers (coworkers).
520 $a Although past research in business ethics and related fields of study offers strong evidence that employees learn from their coworkers' behavior, the details of how coworkers may influence moral choice are not well understood. Most existing models of ethical decision-making tend to summarize research on "referent others"---including employee peers and managers---without specifying either the scope of peer influence or how it may operate at different stages in the EDM process. In addition, some models do not distinguish clearly between coworker influences on ethical decision-making and those of managers. To address these gaps and limitations, this study builds on current EDM models and on theory and empirical findings from a number of related literatures. The central argument is that peer interactions uniquely affect how employees identify and respond to ethics-related information, even after accounting for other major influences.
520 $a Using a national ethics data set, several hypotheses are tested. These hypotheses address peer effects on employees' moral awareness and behavior as well as on how employees experience select outcomes related to ethical culture in their organizations (e.g., satisfaction with the response to reported misconduct).
520 $a The results are informative and help clarify the scope and limitations of peer influence. The primary hypotheses receive modest support, indicating that peers exert social influence at key stages in the EDM process. Importantly, these findings hold even after the effects of other study variables---including those related to management influence---are taken into account. In contrast, hypotheses that peers influence select outcomes associated with ethical culture are not supported. The results and their implications for ethics research and organizational practice are discussed.
590 $a School code: 0008.
650 4 $a Sociology, Social Structure and Development. $3 1017425
650 4 $a Psychology, Industrial. $3 520063
650 4 $a Sociology, Industrial and Labor Relations. $3 1017858
690 $a 0700
690 $a 0624
690 $a 0629
710 2 0 $a The American University. $3 1017567
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 65-11A.
790 1 0 $a Chow, Esther Ngan-Ling, $e advisor
790 $a 0008
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2004
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3152889