語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
Weighted issues of importance versus...
~
Snyder, Larry R.
FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
Weighted issues of importance versus curricular content between undergraduate students and practitioners of occupational therapy and healthcare administration.
紀錄類型:
書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
Weighted issues of importance versus curricular content between undergraduate students and practitioners of occupational therapy and healthcare administration./
作者:
Snyder, Larry R.
面頁冊數:
104 p.
附註:
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-10, Section: B, page: 5307.
Contained By:
Dissertation Abstracts International66-10B.
標題:
Health Sciences, Health Care Management. -
電子資源:
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3191351
ISBN:
9780542355066
Weighted issues of importance versus curricular content between undergraduate students and practitioners of occupational therapy and healthcare administration.
Snyder, Larry R.
Weighted issues of importance versus curricular content between undergraduate students and practitioners of occupational therapy and healthcare administration.
- 104 p.
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-10, Section: B, page: 5307.
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Northcentral University, 2005.
The purpose of this study was to examine the degree to which 15 issues that practitioners of occupational therapy and healthcare administration weigh as important, for the efficient and effective delivery of healthcare services in the United States, compare to the respective knowledge levels provided by undergraduate programs for both professions. A second purpose was to evaluate the concept that both professions would work together more efficiently and effectively if each had a better working knowledge of the other's profession. The goal was to determine if significant differences existed between the issues practitioners weighted as important and the level of knowledge students received in their respective training programs. The study employed a self reporting 16 question survey using a 5 point Likert scale. Both practitioner study populations had to have at least one year of experience, and only senior students in both professional training programs were surveyed. Results of the data analysis revealed that there were perceived weighting differences between the two groups. The issues of knowledge of occupational therapy; occupational therapists knowledge of business; professional development and identity; communication skills; team work skills; healthcare business practices; managed care and reimbursement; moral development and ethics; leadership skills; mentorship; customer service skills; salary issues; clinical skills; clinical reasoning; professional autonomy; and the administrator/clinician relationship were found to demonstrate statistically significant differences. The results indicated that professional education programs for both professions may wish to survey their students and/or examine their curricular content to include more content coverage on the issues for which differences were found. This would reduce the differences and thus, could better prepare occupational therapy and healthcare administration students to enter practice.
ISBN: 9780542355066Subjects--Topical Terms:
1017922
Health Sciences, Health Care Management.
Weighted issues of importance versus curricular content between undergraduate students and practitioners of occupational therapy and healthcare administration.
LDR
:02965nmm 2200289 4500
001
1820042
005
20061011103038.5
008
130610s2005 eng d
020
$a
9780542355066
035
$a
(UnM)AAI3191351
035
$a
AAI3191351
040
$a
UnM
$c
UnM
100
1
$a
Snyder, Larry R.
$3
1909287
245
1 0
$a
Weighted issues of importance versus curricular content between undergraduate students and practitioners of occupational therapy and healthcare administration.
300
$a
104 p.
500
$a
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-10, Section: B, page: 5307.
500
$a
Adviser: Diljit Singh.
502
$a
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Northcentral University, 2005.
520
$a
The purpose of this study was to examine the degree to which 15 issues that practitioners of occupational therapy and healthcare administration weigh as important, for the efficient and effective delivery of healthcare services in the United States, compare to the respective knowledge levels provided by undergraduate programs for both professions. A second purpose was to evaluate the concept that both professions would work together more efficiently and effectively if each had a better working knowledge of the other's profession. The goal was to determine if significant differences existed between the issues practitioners weighted as important and the level of knowledge students received in their respective training programs. The study employed a self reporting 16 question survey using a 5 point Likert scale. Both practitioner study populations had to have at least one year of experience, and only senior students in both professional training programs were surveyed. Results of the data analysis revealed that there were perceived weighting differences between the two groups. The issues of knowledge of occupational therapy; occupational therapists knowledge of business; professional development and identity; communication skills; team work skills; healthcare business practices; managed care and reimbursement; moral development and ethics; leadership skills; mentorship; customer service skills; salary issues; clinical skills; clinical reasoning; professional autonomy; and the administrator/clinician relationship were found to demonstrate statistically significant differences. The results indicated that professional education programs for both professions may wish to survey their students and/or examine their curricular content to include more content coverage on the issues for which differences were found. This would reduce the differences and thus, could better prepare occupational therapy and healthcare administration students to enter practice.
590
$a
School code: 1443.
650
4
$a
Health Sciences, Health Care Management.
$3
1017922
650
4
$a
Business Administration, General.
$3
1017457
650
4
$a
Health Sciences, Education.
$3
1017921
690
$a
0769
690
$a
0310
690
$a
0350
710
2 0
$a
Northcentral University.
$3
1018547
773
0
$t
Dissertation Abstracts International
$g
66-10B.
790
1 0
$a
Singh, Diljit,
$e
advisor
790
$a
1443
791
$a
Ph.D.
792
$a
2005
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3191351
筆 0 讀者評論
館藏地:
全部
電子資源
出版年:
卷號:
館藏
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
條碼號
典藏地名稱
館藏流通類別
資料類型
索書號
使用類型
借閱狀態
預約狀態
備註欄
附件
W9210905
電子資源
11.線上閱覽_V
電子書
EB
一般使用(Normal)
在架
0
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館
處理中
...
變更密碼
登入