東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

An investigation of learning the fun...

Livingston, Edward C.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

An investigation of learning the fundamentals of drafting using hand instruments versus computer-aided drafting.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	An investigation of learning the fundamentals of drafting using hand instruments versus computer-aided drafting./
作者:	Livingston, Edward C.
面頁冊數:	204 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-11, Section: A, page: 3992.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International66-11A.
標題:	Education, Technology. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3196095
ISBN:	0542413302

An investigation of learning the fundamentals of drafting using hand instruments versus computer-aided drafting.
Livingston, Edward C.

An investigation of learning the fundamentals of drafting using hand instruments versus computer-aided drafting. - 204 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-11, Section: A, page: 3992.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Idaho, 2005.

Increasing costs of maintaining two methods of teaching drafting technology, hand instruments and CAD, have prompted research for data on the student outcomes of the two methods as implemented in secondary programs. Emphasis is often placed on one or the other without empirical evidence to show increased student outcomes.

ISBN: 0542413302Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017498
Education, Technology.

An investigation of learning the fundamentals of drafting using hand instruments versus computer-aided drafting.
LDR:02279nmm 2200313 4500 001 1818918
005 20061003091309.5
008 130610s2005 eng d
020 $a 0542413302
035 $a (UnM)AAI3196095
035 $a AAI3196095
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Livingston, Edward C. $3 1908223
245 1 3 $a An investigation of learning the fundamentals of drafting using hand instruments versus computer-aided drafting.
300 $a 204 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-11, Section: A, page: 3992.
500 $a Major Professor: Charles W. Gagel.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Idaho, 2005.
520 $a Increasing costs of maintaining two methods of teaching drafting technology, hand instruments and CAD, have prompted research for data on the student outcomes of the two methods as implemented in secondary programs. Emphasis is often placed on one or the other without empirical evidence to show increased student outcomes.
520 $a The purpose of the study was to investigate the difference between learning the fundamentals of drafting using two methods, hand drafting versus computer aided drafting.
520 $a A quasi-experimental method using two groups in a counterbalanced design was used. A pre-test was administered to Groups 1 and 2 of a sample drawn from secondary pre-engineering students. Treatment 1, hand drafting, was administered to Group 1 and Treatment 2, computer aided drafting, administered to Group 2. A mid-test and post-test was administered to the entire sample. An analysis of variance of mid-test mean scores showed no significant difference between methods. Due to a concern about the low motivational level of the participants after the mid-test, the post-test was not analyzed.
520 $a An instrument was developed for this study and validated by experts. A K-R 20 test showed a high reliability of the instrument (.898). An item analysis was conducted to determine item difficulty and discrimination.
590 $a School code: 0089.
650 4 $a Education, Technology. $3 1017498
650 4 $a Education, Vocational. $3 1017499
690 $a 0710
690 $a 0747
710 2 0 $a University of Idaho. $3 718915
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 66-11A.
790 1 0 $a Gagel, Charles W., $e advisor
790 $a 0089
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2005
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3196095