東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Integration of science and practice:...

Ramesh, Sujatha.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Integration of science and practice: A collective case study of scientist-practitioner programs in counseling psychology.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Integration of science and practice: A collective case study of scientist-practitioner programs in counseling psychology./
作者:	Ramesh, Sujatha.
面頁冊數:	403 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-06, Section: A, page: 2116.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International66-06A.
標題:	Education, Guidance and Counseling. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3180311
ISBN:	0542203685

Integration of science and practice: A collective case study of scientist-practitioner programs in counseling psychology.
Ramesh, Sujatha.

Integration of science and practice: A collective case study of scientist-practitioner programs in counseling psychology. - 403 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-06, Section: A, page: 2116.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Southern California, 2005.

One of the avowed goals of the scientist-practitioner model is implementing the goal of integrating science and practice during doctoral training. However, this goal has proven to be problematic and debates in the academic literature have focused on conceptual and functional issues related to the training model. This dissertation is a study of how exemplar accredited doctoral programs in counseling psychology approach the task of implementing the scientist-practitioner model. A collective case study of eight selected counseling psychology programs was conducted in order to examine the conceptual and functional differences in the implementation of the scientist-practitioner model. Data was gathered from program self-studies, web-site descriptions, dissertation abstracts, and interviews with program directors. A comparison was made between the programs' espoused theories and their theories-in-use. The data showed that these programs espouse methodological diversity for research training and a scientific approach in psychotherapy for practice training. However, examination of the programs' theories-in-use showed that the selected programs emphasize a singular natural science approach rather than a methodologically diverse approach in research training. They approach psychotherapy training through the use of a plurality of models rather than a unified scientific approach. Although the programs in the collective case study espoused the interdependent relationship between science and practice, they define integration of science and practice in various ways. The conclusion of the study is that programs' goal of integration of science and practice is incomplete and, instead, their training tends to provide parallel and somewhat independent training in research and practice. Interviews with training directors showed that they were aware of this problem of integrating science and practice in programs located in research universities. Additional findings were that the programs did not adequately address concerns about the lack of clinical relevance of positivistic research and the importance of understanding the nature of psychotherapy practice. The study concludes by identifying challenges programs face while attempting to integrate science and practice within a university context that emphasizes a single research approach to knowledge generation.

ISBN: 0542203685Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017740
Education, Guidance and Counseling.

Integration of science and practice: A collective case study of scientist-practitioner programs in counseling psychology.
LDR:03355nmm 2200289 4500 001 1817057
005 20060816133913.5
008 130610s2005 eng d
020 $a 0542203685
035 $a (UnM)AAI3180311
035 $a AAI3180311
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Ramesh, Sujatha. $3 1906421
245 1 0 $a Integration of science and practice: A collective case study of scientist-practitioner programs in counseling psychology.
300 $a 403 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-06, Section: A, page: 2116.
500 $a Adviser: Donald E. Polkinghorne.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Southern California, 2005.
520 $a One of the avowed goals of the scientist-practitioner model is implementing the goal of integrating science and practice during doctoral training. However, this goal has proven to be problematic and debates in the academic literature have focused on conceptual and functional issues related to the training model. This dissertation is a study of how exemplar accredited doctoral programs in counseling psychology approach the task of implementing the scientist-practitioner model. A collective case study of eight selected counseling psychology programs was conducted in order to examine the conceptual and functional differences in the implementation of the scientist-practitioner model. Data was gathered from program self-studies, web-site descriptions, dissertation abstracts, and interviews with program directors. A comparison was made between the programs' espoused theories and their theories-in-use. The data showed that these programs espouse methodological diversity for research training and a scientific approach in psychotherapy for practice training. However, examination of the programs' theories-in-use showed that the selected programs emphasize a singular natural science approach rather than a methodologically diverse approach in research training. They approach psychotherapy training through the use of a plurality of models rather than a unified scientific approach. Although the programs in the collective case study espoused the interdependent relationship between science and practice, they define integration of science and practice in various ways. The conclusion of the study is that programs' goal of integration of science and practice is incomplete and, instead, their training tends to provide parallel and somewhat independent training in research and practice. Interviews with training directors showed that they were aware of this problem of integrating science and practice in programs located in research universities. Additional findings were that the programs did not adequately address concerns about the lack of clinical relevance of positivistic research and the importance of understanding the nature of psychotherapy practice. The study concludes by identifying challenges programs face while attempting to integrate science and practice within a university context that emphasizes a single research approach to knowledge generation.
590 $a School code: 0208.
650 4 $a Education, Guidance and Counseling. $3 1017740
650 4 $a Education, Educational Psychology. $3 1017560
650 4 $a Psychology, Clinical. $3 524864
690 $a 0519
690 $a 0525
690 $a 0622
710 2 0 $a University of Southern California. $3 700129
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 66-06A.
790 1 0 $a Polkinghorne, Donald E., $e advisor
790 $a 0208
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2005
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3180311