東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Experimental analysis of task priori...

Hoover, Amy Lynn.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Experimental analysis of task prioritization training for a group of university flight technology students.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Experimental analysis of task prioritization training for a group of university flight technology students./
作者:	Hoover, Amy Lynn.
面頁冊數:	154 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-03, Section: A, page: 0916.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International66-03A.
標題:	Education, Higher. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3169761
ISBN:	0542058472

Experimental analysis of task prioritization training for a group of university flight technology students.
Hoover, Amy Lynn.

Experimental analysis of task prioritization training for a group of university flight technology students. - 154 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-03, Section: A, page: 0916.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Oregon State University, 2005.

Task prioritization performance was evaluated for pilots who participated in a concurrent task management (CTM) training course and pilots who did not. CTM is the process by which pilots selectively attend to high priority tasks and shed non-priority tasks. Twenty seven pilots enrolled in a university flight technology program were randomly assigned to an experimental group and a control group. Pilots flew pretest and posttest simulated flights on an FAA approved flight training device (FTD). Twenty potential task prioritization errors were embedded at 14 locations within the flight scenarios. Pretest CTM performance of the two groups was comparable. During a two week period between pretest and posttest simulated flights pilots in the experimental group participated in a CTM training course designed and taught by an FAA certified flight instructor and pilots in the control group did not.

ISBN: 0542058472Subjects--Topical Terms:

543175
Education, Higher.

Experimental analysis of task prioritization training for a group of university flight technology students.
LDR:03229nmm 2200301 4500 001 1816675
005 20060714114123.5
008 130610s2005 eng d
020 $a 0542058472
035 $a (UnM)AAI3169761
035 $a AAI3169761
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Hoover, Amy Lynn. $3 1906050
245 1 0 $a Experimental analysis of task prioritization training for a group of university flight technology students.
300 $a 154 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-03, Section: A, page: 0916.
500 $a Adviser: Darlene F. Russ-Eft.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Oregon State University, 2005.
520 $a Task prioritization performance was evaluated for pilots who participated in a concurrent task management (CTM) training course and pilots who did not. CTM is the process by which pilots selectively attend to high priority tasks and shed non-priority tasks. Twenty seven pilots enrolled in a university flight technology program were randomly assigned to an experimental group and a control group. Pilots flew pretest and posttest simulated flights on an FAA approved flight training device (FTD). Twenty potential task prioritization errors were embedded at 14 locations within the flight scenarios. Pretest CTM performance of the two groups was comparable. During a two week period between pretest and posttest simulated flights pilots in the experimental group participated in a CTM training course designed and taught by an FAA certified flight instructor and pilots in the control group did not.
520 $a A Mann-Whitney U test rejected the null hypothesis that there was no difference in posttest CTM errors between the groups, indicating a positive training effect for experimental group pilots. Longer term training effects were not evaluated. Different cognitive processing models described various pilot behaviors; some behaviors were described by single channel theory, some by single resource theory, and others by multiple resource theory. Mispriotization due to the interruption of an aviate task by a communicate task occurred more frequently than interruption of a navigate task by a communicate task. Fixation on the GPS navigational system caused more than half the pilots to deviate from primary aviate tasks to attend to the secondary navigate task.
520 $a Additional research with different participants is recommended. A study comparing training results between pilots who have different training backgrounds is also recommended. A longer time period between pretest and posttest and/or a longitudinal study is recommended to test for longer term training effects. Qualitative studies could also be used to enhance experiments, such as gathering responses from participants to discern the extent of their learning. Further studies using cockpits with higher levels of automation and complexity, such as new generation flat panel or 3D cockpit displays is recommended.
590 $a School code: 0172.
650 4 $a Education, Higher. $3 543175
650 4 $a Psychology, Cognitive. $3 1017810
690 $a 0745
690 $a 0633
710 2 0 $a Oregon State University. $3 625720
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 66-03A.
790 1 0 $a Russ-Eft, Darlene F., $e advisor
790 $a 0172
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2005
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3169761