東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Is the Quality Promotion Model valid?

McKibben, Linda J.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Is the Quality Promotion Model valid?

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Is the Quality Promotion Model valid?/
作者:	McKibben, Linda J.
面頁冊數:	159 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-06, Section: B, page: 3091.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International66-06B.
標題:	Health Sciences, Public Health. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3180548
ISBN:	0542204673

Is the Quality Promotion Model valid?
McKibben, Linda J.

Is the Quality Promotion Model valid? - 159 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-06, Section: B, page: 3091.

Thesis (Dr.P.H.)--University of Michigan, School of Public Health, 2005.

This dissertation evaluates an innovative organizational model of change, the Quality Promotion Model (QPM). The model merges resource dependency and organizational innovation perspectives to explain how and why government promotion of standing orders programs (SOPs) for influenza vaccination of nursing facility (NF) residents is effective. The QPM posits that NFs that exhibit greater dependency on government for resources and abundance of general resources will have greater motivation to adopt and implement a quality improvement innovation in response to government intervention.

ISBN: 0542204673Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017659
Health Sciences, Public Health.

Is the Quality Promotion Model valid?
LDR:03443nmm 2200325 4500 001 1815495
005 20060710102010.5
008 130610s2005 eng d
020 $a 0542204673
035 $a (UnM)AAI3180548
035 $a AAI3180548
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a McKibben, Linda J. $3 1904916
245 1 0 $a Is the Quality Promotion Model valid?
300 $a 159 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-06, Section: B, page: 3091.
500 $a Chair: Jane C. Banaszak-Holl.
502 $a Thesis (Dr.P.H.)--University of Michigan, School of Public Health, 2005.
520 $a This dissertation evaluates an innovative organizational model of change, the Quality Promotion Model (QPM). The model merges resource dependency and organizational innovation perspectives to explain how and why government promotion of standing orders programs (SOPs) for influenza vaccination of nursing facility (NF) residents is effective. The QPM posits that NFs that exhibit greater dependency on government for resources and abundance of general resources will have greater motivation to adopt and implement a quality improvement innovation in response to government intervention.
520 $a The study utilizes evaluation data from a 1999--2001 Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) project in twelve states. Quality Improvement Organizations (QIOs), state-based private contractors of CMS, collected pre- and post-intervention survey data in all states and promoted SOP implementation to all Medicaid- and Medicare-licensed NFs in seven. The survey collected information about NF programs and staff perceptions of barriers to SOPs. The intervention consisted of QIO programs, which varied in intensity and relaxation of CMS rules prohibiting SOP policies in NFs. Structural characteristics of NFs from CMS administrative data measured abundance of general resources and resource dependency on CMS.
520 $a Logistic regression models support the effectiveness of government intervention and QIO programs to increase SOP uptake. External policy disincentives, including legal authority of staff to vaccinate by standing orders, were important barriers to implementation, but less important in states that received high-intensity QIO programs. Study limitations impeded full QPM validity testing; however, evidence to support resource dependency and diffusion of innovation perspectives is present in the study population of NFs.
520 $a Policy implications include the need for government to remove policy barriers to innovations early; increase intensity of QIO programs relative to implementation barriers; focus on states and NFs that accept the innovation; and conduct theory-based quality promotion research. Resources for government innovation promotion may be titrated most efficiently if barriers and program intensity data are collected and analyzed routinely. Alternative policies, e.g. stronger regulation, public reporting, and pay-for-performance incentives, should supplement quality promotion to achieve national public health goals.
590 $a School code: 0766.
650 4 $a Health Sciences, Public Health. $3 1017659
650 4 $a Health Sciences, Health Care Management. $3 1017922
650 4 $a Sociology, Theory and Methods. $3 626625
690 $a 0573
690 $a 0769
690 $a 0344
710 2 0 $a University of Michigan, School of Public Health. $3 1264948
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 66-06B.
790 1 0 $a Banaszak-Holl, Jane C., $e advisor
790 $a 0766
791 $a Dr.P.H.
792 $a 2005
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3180548