東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Validity of WISC-IV and CTONI: Inter...

Launey, Kathryn.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Validity of WISC-IV and CTONI: Interpretation of IQ scores for students classified educable mentally disabled.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Validity of WISC-IV and CTONI: Interpretation of IQ scores for students classified educable mentally disabled./
作者:	Launey, Kathryn.
面頁冊數:	118 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-03, Section: B, page: 1780.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International66-03B.
標題:	Psychology, Psychometrics. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3169043
ISBN:	0542050595

Validity of WISC-IV and CTONI: Interpretation of IQ scores for students classified educable mentally disabled.
Launey, Kathryn.

Validity of WISC-IV and CTONI: Interpretation of IQ scores for students classified educable mentally disabled. - 118 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-03, Section: B, page: 1780.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Walden University, 2005.

This quantitative study examined the concurrent and construct validity of the Comprehensive Test of Nonverbal Intelligence (CTONI) and the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, Fourth Edition (WISC-IV). Forty students previously classified as educable mentally disabled (EMD) comprised the sample. WISC-IV Full Scale and CTONI Nonverbal IQ scores were compared with each other and the previously administered WISC-III, using correlations and dependent t tests. Practical validity was established by determined the percentage of previous eligibility decisions that were confirmed by the WISC-IV and the CTONI. Because the WISC-III and WISC-IV were not significantly different and correlated at .91 when adjusted for restricted range, the validity of the WISC-IV was established for use in eligibility decisions of students classified EMD in the target county. Similar validity for the CTONI was not established. Concerns were raised regarding adequacy of the nonverbal instrument's floor, especially in the area of analogical reasoning. Performance on the categorical subtests by the sample suggested a possible area of relative strength. The study should be replicated with larger samples across a wider geographical region in order to generalize the findings. Similar studies were called for using other nonverbal measures of intelligence or representing students with other disabilities. Revision of the CTONI was recommended to extend the floor downward.

ISBN: 0542050595Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017742
Psychology, Psychometrics.

Validity of WISC-IV and CTONI: Interpretation of IQ scores for students classified educable mentally disabled.
LDR:02398nmm 2200289 4500 001 1815322
005 20060710070943.5
008 130610s2005 eng d
020 $a 0542050595
035 $a (UnM)AAI3169043
035 $a AAI3169043
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Launey, Kathryn. $3 1904757
245 1 0 $a Validity of WISC-IV and CTONI: Interpretation of IQ scores for students classified educable mentally disabled.
300 $a 118 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-03, Section: B, page: 1780.
500 $a Adviser: James L. Carroll.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Walden University, 2005.
520 $a This quantitative study examined the concurrent and construct validity of the Comprehensive Test of Nonverbal Intelligence (CTONI) and the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, Fourth Edition (WISC-IV). Forty students previously classified as educable mentally disabled (EMD) comprised the sample. WISC-IV Full Scale and CTONI Nonverbal IQ scores were compared with each other and the previously administered WISC-III, using correlations and dependent t tests. Practical validity was established by determined the percentage of previous eligibility decisions that were confirmed by the WISC-IV and the CTONI. Because the WISC-III and WISC-IV were not significantly different and correlated at .91 when adjusted for restricted range, the validity of the WISC-IV was established for use in eligibility decisions of students classified EMD in the target county. Similar validity for the CTONI was not established. Concerns were raised regarding adequacy of the nonverbal instrument's floor, especially in the area of analogical reasoning. Performance on the categorical subtests by the sample suggested a possible area of relative strength. The study should be replicated with larger samples across a wider geographical region in order to generalize the findings. Similar studies were called for using other nonverbal measures of intelligence or representing students with other disabilities. Revision of the CTONI was recommended to extend the floor downward.
590 $a School code: 0543.
650 4 $a Psychology, Psychometrics. $3 1017742
650 4 $a Education, Tests and Measurements. $3 1017589
650 4 $a Education, Special. $3 606639
690 $a 0632
690 $a 0288
690 $a 0529
710 2 0 $a Walden University. $3 718925
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 66-03B.
790 1 0 $a Carroll, James L., $e advisor
790 $a 0543
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2005
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3169043