東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Now you see them, now you don't: Th...

Haskins, Heather Victoria.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Now you see them, now you don't: The critical reception of women's work at the Arts & Crafts Exhibition Society, 1888--1916 (England).

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Now you see them, now you don't: The critical reception of women's work at the Arts & Crafts Exhibition Society, 1888--1916 (England)./
作者:	Haskins, Heather Victoria.
面頁冊數:	432 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-06, Section: A, page: 1993.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International66-06A.
標題:	Art History. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=NR04065
ISBN:	0494040653

Now you see them, now you don't: The critical reception of women's work at the Arts & Crafts Exhibition Society, 1888--1916 (England).
Haskins, Heather Victoria.

Now you see them, now you don't: The critical reception of women's work at the Arts & Crafts Exhibition Society, 1888--1916 (England). - 432 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-06, Section: A, page: 1993.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Concordia University (Canada), 2005.

This preliminary study of the critical reaction to the work of women practitioners in the decorative arts in the late Victorian and Edwardian periods, has been undertaken in order to further an understanding of the voices which contributed to constructions of contemporary femininity. It investigates the reactions of critics to the work of 730 women who contributed to four exhibitions of the Arts & Crafts Exhibition Society in London, held in 1888, 1890, 1903 and 1916. The press policy of the ACES, together with the context of contemporary art criticism practices and background information on the critics and periodicals used, are set out in Chapter 1. For each exhibition, critical reaction to women's work is summarised in a section of general comments on women's exhibits, and particularised with an indepth look at the reception of Kate Faulkner, May Morris, Una Taylor, Georgina Gaskin, Grace Christie and Phoebe Stabler. Periodicals which consistently reviewed women's work were from all classes, and criticism of women's decorative arts varied widely, but certain trends emerged which revealed greater support for women designers than makers, and more praise for women designers who worked in acceptable 'feminine' mediums of embroidery, jewellery, or gesso decoration. Often women were named but their work was not discussed. Women who collaborated with their husbands also found their contributions glossed over. Some women's work was discussed with feminised language, some with both masculine and feminine terms, and some with rather gender-neutral language. Formal analysis of women's decorative art was rare. Press notices of women's work dropped significantly between 1903 and 1916, due to a combination of factors. Overall the analysis of women's press reception at ACES was facilitated by knowledge of the critic and editorial policy of the periodical.

ISBN: 0494040653Subjects--Topical Terms:

635474
Art History.

Now you see them, now you don't: The critical reception of women's work at the Arts & Crafts Exhibition Society, 1888--1916 (England).
LDR:02761nmm 2200265 4500 001 1814792
005 20060719075931.5
008 130610s2005 eng d
020 $a 0494040653
035 $a (UnM)AAINR04065
035 $a AAINR04065
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Haskins, Heather Victoria. $3 1904242
245 1 0 $a Now you see them, now you don't: The critical reception of women's work at the Arts & Crafts Exhibition Society, 1888--1916 (England).
300 $a 432 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-06, Section: A, page: 1993.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Concordia University (Canada), 2005.
520 $a This preliminary study of the critical reaction to the work of women practitioners in the decorative arts in the late Victorian and Edwardian periods, has been undertaken in order to further an understanding of the voices which contributed to constructions of contemporary femininity. It investigates the reactions of critics to the work of 730 women who contributed to four exhibitions of the Arts & Crafts Exhibition Society in London, held in 1888, 1890, 1903 and 1916. The press policy of the ACES, together with the context of contemporary art criticism practices and background information on the critics and periodicals used, are set out in Chapter 1. For each exhibition, critical reaction to women's work is summarised in a section of general comments on women's exhibits, and particularised with an indepth look at the reception of Kate Faulkner, May Morris, Una Taylor, Georgina Gaskin, Grace Christie and Phoebe Stabler. Periodicals which consistently reviewed women's work were from all classes, and criticism of women's decorative arts varied widely, but certain trends emerged which revealed greater support for women designers than makers, and more praise for women designers who worked in acceptable 'feminine' mediums of embroidery, jewellery, or gesso decoration. Often women were named but their work was not discussed. Women who collaborated with their husbands also found their contributions glossed over. Some women's work was discussed with feminised language, some with both masculine and feminine terms, and some with rather gender-neutral language. Formal analysis of women's decorative art was rare. Press notices of women's work dropped significantly between 1903 and 1916, due to a combination of factors. Overall the analysis of women's press reception at ACES was facilitated by knowledge of the critic and editorial policy of the periodical.
590 $a School code: 0228.
650 4 $a Art History. $3 635474
650 4 $a Design and Decorative Arts. $3 1024640
650 4 $a Women's Studies. $3 1017481
690 $a 0377
690 $a 0389
690 $a 0453
710 2 0 $a Concordia University (Canada). $3 1018569
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 66-06A.
790 $a 0228
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2005
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=NR04065