東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

A descriptive study of faculty and s...

March, Karen S.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

A descriptive study of faculty and staff giving practices at public institutions of higher education within the United States.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	A descriptive study of faculty and staff giving practices at public institutions of higher education within the United States./
作者:	March, Karen S.
面頁冊數:	92 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-05, Section: A, page: 1667.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International66-05A.
標題:	Education, Higher. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3173632
ISBN:	0542110326

A descriptive study of faculty and staff giving practices at public institutions of higher education within the United States.
March, Karen S.

A descriptive study of faculty and staff giving practices at public institutions of higher education within the United States. - 92 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-05, Section: A, page: 1667.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--State University of New York at Buffalo, 2005.

The purpose of this study was to obtain information about faculty and staff giving practices at public institutions of higher education across the United States and its territories. Chief advancement officers at 563 public institutions were invited to participate in the study. One hundred sixty-four participants completed the study in which data were submitted via a web-based questionnaire. A Faculty and Staff Giving Questionnaire was utilized for data collection. The one-way beween-groups analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine if there were any differences in the percentage of faculty and staff giving based upon (a) institutional size; (b) Carnegie classification; or (c) geographical region of the country. Percentage of faculty and staff giving based upon manner of solicitation was addressed using descriptive statistics. Similarly, the likelihood of faculty and staff giving restricted versus unrestricted gifts was answered by descriptive statistics.

ISBN: 0542110326Subjects--Topical Terms:

543175
Education, Higher.

A descriptive study of faculty and staff giving practices at public institutions of higher education within the United States.
LDR:02942nmm 2200289 4500 001 1814725
005 20060719075912.5
008 130610s2005 eng d
020 $a 0542110326
035 $a (UnM)AAI3173632
035 $a AAI3173632
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a March, Karen S. $3 1904178
245 1 2 $a A descriptive study of faculty and staff giving practices at public institutions of higher education within the United States.
300 $a 92 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-05, Section: A, page: 1667.
500 $a Adviser: Ronald H. Stein.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--State University of New York at Buffalo, 2005.
520 $a The purpose of this study was to obtain information about faculty and staff giving practices at public institutions of higher education across the United States and its territories. Chief advancement officers at 563 public institutions were invited to participate in the study. One hundred sixty-four participants completed the study in which data were submitted via a web-based questionnaire. A Faculty and Staff Giving Questionnaire was utilized for data collection. The one-way beween-groups analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine if there were any differences in the percentage of faculty and staff giving based upon (a) institutional size; (b) Carnegie classification; or (c) geographical region of the country. Percentage of faculty and staff giving based upon manner of solicitation was addressed using descriptive statistics. Similarly, the likelihood of faculty and staff giving restricted versus unrestricted gifts was answered by descriptive statistics.
520 $a The results of the data analysis revealed that percentages of faculty and staff giving differed significantly according to institutional size (faculty p < .05; staff p < .01) and Carnegie classification (faculty p < .01; staff p < .01). While percentage of faculty giving differed significantly across geographical regions (p < .01), percentage of staff giving did not. Both faculty and staff were somewhat likely to give when solicited by a peer, department chair, the campaign chairperson or the President of the institution, while both groups were less likely to give when solicited by students. Both faculty and staff tended to give restricted gifts by a substantial margin over unrestricted gifts. Among campus beneficiaries of faculty and staff giving, academics, scholarships and special interest projects consistently ranked most prominently. Of those who participated in the study, just 76.8% reported that their institutions solicited faculty and staff for annual giving.
590 $a School code: 0656.
650 4 $a Education, Higher. $3 543175
650 4 $a Education, Finance. $3 1020300
690 $a 0745
690 $a 0277
710 2 0 $a State University of New York at Buffalo. $3 1017814
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 66-05A.
790 1 0 $a Stein, Ronald H., $e advisor
790 $a 0656
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2005
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3173632