東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Academic freedom in public higher ed...

LaNear, John A.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Academic freedom in public higher education: For the faculty or institution?

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Academic freedom in public higher education: For the faculty or institution?/
作者:	LaNear, John A.
面頁冊數:	277 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-05, Section: A, page: 1666.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International66-05A.
標題:	Education, Higher. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3175544
ISBN:	0542142090

Academic freedom in public higher education: For the faculty or institution?
LaNear, John A.

Academic freedom in public higher education: For the faculty or institution? - 277 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-05, Section: A, page: 1666.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Wisconsin - Madison, 2005.

The U.S. Supreme Court has discussed academic freedom in a variety of circumstances, leading to an assortment of judicial declarations regarding its importance in our democratic society. But the Court's pronouncements have been vague and unstructured, offering little guidance to lower courts and litigants. Additionally, the Court has suggested, albeit inconclusively, that academic freedom may be entitled to some degree of constitutional protection. As a result of these inconclusive pronouncements, some lower courts have been hesitant to afford academic freedom the constitutional protection alluded to by the Supreme Court.

ISBN: 0542142090Subjects--Topical Terms:

543175
Education, Higher.

Academic freedom in public higher education: For the faculty or institution?
LDR:03158nmm 2200325 4500 001 1812532
005 20060424072444.5
008 130610s2005 eng d
020 $a 0542142090
035 $a (UnM)AAI3175544
035 $a AAI3175544
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a LaNear, John A. $3 1902076
245 1 0 $a Academic freedom in public higher education: For the faculty or institution?
300 $a 277 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-05, Section: A, page: 1666.
500 $a Supervisor: Julie Mead.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Wisconsin - Madison, 2005.
520 $a The U.S. Supreme Court has discussed academic freedom in a variety of circumstances, leading to an assortment of judicial declarations regarding its importance in our democratic society. But the Court's pronouncements have been vague and unstructured, offering little guidance to lower courts and litigants. Additionally, the Court has suggested, albeit inconclusively, that academic freedom may be entitled to some degree of constitutional protection. As a result of these inconclusive pronouncements, some lower courts have been hesitant to afford academic freedom the constitutional protection alluded to by the Supreme Court.
520 $a More recent academic freedom cases have pitted faculty members against their universities qua institutions, leading to competing claims of academic freedom---that of the individual and that of the institution. This specific conflict was not envisioned by the Supreme Court as it proffered broad, open statements in support of a more universal concept of academic freedom Thus, the Court's amorphous pronouncements offer little guidance to lower courts attempting to balance the academic freedom rights of individuals against academic freedom rights of institutions. While the Court has discussed the issue of academic freedom in various settings, it has yet to directly evaluate competing individual and institutional claims to academic freedom. As a result, lower courts---and litigants, potential litigants, and policymakers---are left without a framework or structure in which to evaluate competing claims to academic freedom in the constitutional context.
520 $a Moreover, recent court decisions have misread or misinterpreted early Supreme Court decisions. These mis-readings have led to a conflation of the concepts of institutional academic freedom and institutional autonomy (or academic abstention). This conflation has starkly limited the protections afforded to individual academic freedom.
520 $a This dissertation examines and details the misunderstandings embodied in recent court decisions and tracks the impact of these erroneous decisions. Additionally, this dissertation concludes by detailing policy and litigation implications for individuals and institutions.
590 $a School code: 0262.
650 4 $a Education, Higher. $3 543175
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
650 4 $a Education, History of. $3 599244
690 $a 0745
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0520
710 2 0 $a The University of Wisconsin - Madison. $3 626640
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 66-05A.
790 1 0 $a Mead, Julie, $e advisor
790 $a 0262
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2005
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3175544