東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

A comprehensive analysis of judicial...

Smith, Tina M. Chitwood.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

A comprehensive analysis of judicial responses to negligence cases in the elementary school.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	A comprehensive analysis of judicial responses to negligence cases in the elementary school./
作者:	Smith, Tina M. Chitwood.
面頁冊數:	165 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-04, Section: A, page: 1237.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International66-04A.
標題:	Education, Administration. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3172266
ISBN:	0542094908

A comprehensive analysis of judicial responses to negligence cases in the elementary school.
Smith, Tina M. Chitwood.

A comprehensive analysis of judicial responses to negligence cases in the elementary school. - 165 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-04, Section: A, page: 1237.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Louisville, 2005.

The education literature analyzed for this study warned of the likelihood of a plaintiff naming a teacher, administrator, or school district representative as a defendant in a negligence lawsuit. The literature in the field of law explained the elements of negligence, the available defenses, and provided a framework to structure the study. The researcher analyzed cases surrounding negligence in elementary schools in an attempt to answer the research question.

ISBN: 0542094908Subjects--Topical Terms:

626645
Education, Administration.

A comprehensive analysis of judicial responses to negligence cases in the elementary school.
LDR:03160nmm 2200325 4500 001 1812510
005 20060424072442.5
008 130610s2005 eng d
020 $a 0542094908
035 $a (UnM)AAI3172266
035 $a AAI3172266
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Smith, Tina M. Chitwood. $3 1902055
245 1 2 $a A comprehensive analysis of judicial responses to negligence cases in the elementary school.
300 $a 165 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-04, Section: A, page: 1237.
500 $a Adviser: John Strope, Jr.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Louisville, 2005.
520 $a The education literature analyzed for this study warned of the likelihood of a plaintiff naming a teacher, administrator, or school district representative as a defendant in a negligence lawsuit. The literature in the field of law explained the elements of negligence, the available defenses, and provided a framework to structure the study. The researcher analyzed cases surrounding negligence in elementary schools in an attempt to answer the research question.
520 $a The following research question guided this study: When are teachers, administrators, school district representatives, and school districts sued successfully for negligence? The researcher examined a broad spectrum of negligence cases and incorporated every case in the national reporting system related to negligence in the elementary school setting. The cases incorporated in this study included injuries that occurred both during the school day and directly before or after school.
520 $a By using legal methodology, the researcher identified 167 cases related to the research question. Critical examination of each case provided a full understanding of the judicial responses related to negligence in the elementary school. Furthermore, the researcher created a data analysis form used to capture identical information from each case to assess relationships among the cases. Although the study did not use any form of statistical analysis, the researcher gathered quantifiable data for describing the cases collectively.
520 $a The most significant finding in this study was that a comprehensive analysis of reported cases yielded only 167 cases over the last thirty-four years. Teachers, administrators, school district representatives, and school districts prevailed in ninety of the 167 cases. Judicial responses focused on the element of breach of duty more than any other element. One hundred eight of the cases focused on breach of duty. The researcher classified the plaintiff as a student in 159 cases. Plaintiffs named the school system as defendants in 156 cases. One hundred fifty-three of the cases occurred in public elementary schools. Eighty-eight percent of the injuries occurred during non-instructional activities.
590 $a School code: 0110.
650 4 $a Education, Administration. $3 626645
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
650 4 $a Sociology, Industrial and Labor Relations. $3 1017858
690 $a 0514
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0629
710 2 0 $a University of Louisville. $3 1017614
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 66-04A.
790 1 0 $a Strope, John, Jr., $e advisor
790 $a 0110
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2005
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3172266