東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The influence of the cross-race effe...

Mitchell, Tara Leigh.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The influence of the cross-race effect on lineup construction and fairness.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The influence of the cross-race effect on lineup construction and fairness./
作者:	Mitchell, Tara Leigh.
面頁冊數:	86 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-03, Section: B, page: 1767.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International66-03B.
標題:	Psychology, Experimental. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3169464
ISBN:	0542055198

The influence of the cross-race effect on lineup construction and fairness.
Mitchell, Tara Leigh.

The influence of the cross-race effect on lineup construction and fairness. - 86 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-03, Section: B, page: 1767.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Florida International University, 2005.

Lineup procedures have recently garnered extensive empirical attention, in an effort to reduce the number of mistaken identifications that plague the criminal justice system. Relatively little attention, however, has been paid to the influence of the lineup constructor or the lineup construction technique on the quality of the lineup. This study examined whether the cross-race effect has an influence on the quality of lineups constructed using a match-to-suspect or match-to-description technique in a series of three phases. Participants generated descriptions of same- and other-race targets in Phase 1, which were used in Phase 2. In Phase 2, participants were asked to create lineups for own-race targets and other-race targets using one of two techniques. The lineups created in this phase were examined for lineup quality in Phase 3 by calculating lineup fairness assessments through the use of a mock witness paradigm.

ISBN: 0542055198Subjects--Topical Terms:

517106
Psychology, Experimental.

The influence of the cross-race effect on lineup construction and fairness.
LDR:02901nmm 2200301 4500 001 1812492
005 20060424072441.5
008 130610s2005 eng d
020 $a 0542055198
035 $a (UnM)AAI3169464
035 $a AAI3169464
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Mitchell, Tara Leigh. $3 1902037
245 1 4 $a The influence of the cross-race effect on lineup construction and fairness.
300 $a 86 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-03, Section: B, page: 1767.
500 $a Major Professor: Christian A. Meissner.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Florida International University, 2005.
520 $a Lineup procedures have recently garnered extensive empirical attention, in an effort to reduce the number of mistaken identifications that plague the criminal justice system. Relatively little attention, however, has been paid to the influence of the lineup constructor or the lineup construction technique on the quality of the lineup. This study examined whether the cross-race effect has an influence on the quality of lineups constructed using a match-to-suspect or match-to-description technique in a series of three phases. Participants generated descriptions of same- and other-race targets in Phase 1, which were used in Phase 2. In Phase 2, participants were asked to create lineups for own-race targets and other-race targets using one of two techniques. The lineups created in this phase were examined for lineup quality in Phase 3 by calculating lineup fairness assessments through the use of a mock witness paradigm.
520 $a Overall, the results of these experiment phases suggest that the race of those involved in the lineup construction process influences lineups. There was no difference in witness description accuracy in Phase 1, which ran counter to predictions based on the cross-race effect. The cross-race effect was observed, however, in Phases 2 and 3. The lineup construction technique used also influenced several of the process measures, selection estimates, and fairness judgments in Phase 2. Interestingly, the presence of the cross-race effect was in the opposite direction as predicted for some measures in both phases. In Phase 2, the cross-race effect was as predicted for number of foils viewed, but in the opposite direction for average time spent viewing each foil. In Phase 3, the cross-race effect was in the opposite direction than predicted, with higher levels of lineup fairness in other-race lineups. The practical implications of these findings are discussed in relation to lineup fairness within the legal system.
590 $a School code: 1023.
650 4 $a Psychology, Experimental. $3 517106
650 4 $a Psychology, Cognitive. $3 1017810
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
690 $a 0623
690 $a 0633
690 $a 0398
710 2 0 $a Florida International University. $3 718935
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 66-03B.
790 1 0 $a Meissner, Christian A., $e advisor
790 $a 1023
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2005
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3169464