東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Enhancing robust design with aid of ...

Hu, Minxiang (Matthew).

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Enhancing robust design with aid of TRIZ and Axiomatic Design.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Enhancing robust design with aid of TRIZ and Axiomatic Design./
Author:	Hu, Minxiang (Matthew).
Description:	270 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 61-10, Section: B, page: 5498.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International61-10B.
Subject:	Engineering, Industrial. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9992213
ISBN:	0599999829

Enhancing robust design with aid of TRIZ and Axiomatic Design.
Hu, Minxiang (Matthew).

Enhancing robust design with aid of TRIZ and Axiomatic Design. - 270 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 61-10, Section: B, page: 5498.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Wayne State University, 2000.

Design environments that facilitate and support the upfront robustness thinking and robust design must shift the paradigm from reactive problem solving to enhancing the robustness of basic function of product design. Notably, there is significant motivation for research that focuses on improving design robustness from the earliest design stages. One of the most important tasks in robust design is to select an appropriate system output response in the study. The quality of this selection will greatly affect the effectiveness of the robust design project. Currently, this selection process is more like art than science. By using TRIZ and Axiomatic Design principle, several new approaches to enhance robust design are developed. These approaches enable us to select the appropriate system output response in a systematic fashion and bridge the gap between conceptual design and parameter design.

ISBN: 0599999829Subjects--Topical Terms:

626639
Engineering, Industrial.

Enhancing robust design with aid of TRIZ and Axiomatic Design.
LDR:03288nmm 2200301 4500 001 1812225
005 20060418075644.5
008 130610s2000 eng d
020 $a 0599999829
035 $a (UnM)AAI9992213
035 $a AAI9992213
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Hu, Minxiang (Matthew). $3 1901779
245 1 0 $a Enhancing robust design with aid of TRIZ and Axiomatic Design.
300 $a 270 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 61-10, Section: B, page: 5498.
500 $a Adviser: Kai Yang.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Wayne State University, 2000.
520 $a Design environments that facilitate and support the upfront robustness thinking and robust design must shift the paradigm from reactive problem solving to enhancing the robustness of basic function of product design. Notably, there is significant motivation for research that focuses on improving design robustness from the earliest design stages. One of the most important tasks in robust design is to select an appropriate system output response in the study. The quality of this selection will greatly affect the effectiveness of the robust design project. Currently, this selection process is more like art than science. By using TRIZ and Axiomatic Design principle, several new approaches to enhance robust design are developed. These approaches enable us to select the appropriate system output response in a systematic fashion and bridge the gap between conceptual design and parameter design.
520 $a This research proposes a methodology based on the blending of TRIZ and Axiomatic Design approaches. Toward this end, a framework for integrated identification of system output response is presented. Two mechanisms are central to the framework definition, including: (1) design response structural model using substance-field model supporting proper identification of system output response especially energy-related system output response identification, design optimization and capturing system functional behaviors. A four-rule based on substance-field model and mode of action is developed to provide a scientific way of identifying a proper system output response. (2) design response structural modeling environment through Axiomatic Deign supporting concept model analysis, functional breakdown, knowledge capture, capturing design intent, requirements, dependency relationships and feedback for conceptual design improvements, evaluation and encouraging and facilitating the upfront robustness thinking in terms of ideal relationship between system input and system output and preparing for parameter design.
520 $a The approach described in this research was successfully applied and verified in numerous case studies at some large automotive companies. Several examples and a case study are provided and demonstrate the methodology for technologically sophisticated system output responses identification and how the gap between conceptual design and parameter design can be bridged and reduced.
590 $a School code: 0254.
650 4 $a Engineering, Industrial. $3 626639
650 4 $a Engineering, Automotive. $3 1018477
690 $a 0546
690 $a 0540
710 2 0 $a Wayne State University. $3 975058
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 61-10B.
790 1 0 $a Yang, Kai, $e advisor
790 $a 0254
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2000
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9992213