東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Artist, citizen, state: Toward a th...

DeVereaux, Constance.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Artist, citizen, state: Toward a theory of arts policy.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Artist, citizen, state: Toward a theory of arts policy./
作者:	DeVereaux, Constance.
面頁冊數:	349 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-04, Section: A, page: 1400.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International64-04A.
標題:	Political Science, Public Administration. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3086741

Artist, citizen, state: Toward a theory of arts policy.
DeVereaux, Constance.

Artist, citizen, state: Toward a theory of arts policy. - 349 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-04, Section: A, page: 1400.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Claremont Graduate University, 2003.

If the history of arts policy in the United States is any guide, the balance between policy and the arts is a difficult one. It is often noted that unlike other developed Western nations, the United States had no official, national arts policy until passage of Public Law 89-209, the Federal Council on the Arts and Humanities Act of 1965, which created the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA), the federal agency devoted to policy and monetary support of the arts. Its passage was a momentous event given the concerted, though unsuccessful efforts by prominent citizens and statesmen, since the founding of the republic, to create such an agency. Since passage of the legislation, the NEA has been besieged by high-profile controversies that eventually threatened its demise. In sum, the problems of the NEA may be attributed to a host of policy problems. However, it has been suggested that these problems are better explained as philosophical problems relating to competing values in defining “the arts” as well as misunderstandings about key foundational principles, i.e., the epistemological and ontological foundations of arts policy and how these principles affect the needs and interests of artists, citizens, and the state, as the three entities to whom the original legislation was directed. Art theorist Karol Berger sees a connection between philosophical theory and the practical problems encountered within a field. This study explores the theoretical and practical problems of arts policy with the intent of formulating principles for a theory of arts policy as a contribution toward resolving these problems.Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017438
Political Science, Public Administration.

Artist, citizen, state: Toward a theory of arts policy.
LDR:02844nmm 2200277 4500 001 1810745
005 20040329092835.5
008 130610s2003 eng d
035 $a (UnM)AAI3086741
035 $a AAI3086741
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a DeVereaux, Constance. $3 1323144
245 1 0 $a Artist, citizen, state: Toward a theory of arts policy.
300 $a 349 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-04, Section: A, page: 1400.
500 $a Adviser: Charles Young.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Claremont Graduate University, 2003.
520 $a If the history of arts policy in the United States is any guide, the balance between policy and the arts is a difficult one. It is often noted that unlike other developed Western nations, the United States had no official, national arts policy until passage of Public Law 89-209, the Federal Council on the Arts and Humanities Act of 1965, which created the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA), the federal agency devoted to policy and monetary support of the arts. Its passage was a momentous event given the concerted, though unsuccessful efforts by prominent citizens and statesmen, since the founding of the republic, to create such an agency. Since passage of the legislation, the NEA has been besieged by high-profile controversies that eventually threatened its demise. In sum, the problems of the NEA may be attributed to a host of policy problems. However, it has been suggested that these problems are better explained as philosophical problems relating to competing values in defining “the arts” as well as misunderstandings about key foundational principles, i.e., the epistemological and ontological foundations of arts policy and how these principles affect the needs and interests of artists, citizens, and the state, as the three entities to whom the original legislation was directed. Art theorist Karol Berger sees a connection between philosophical theory and the practical problems encountered within a field. This study explores the theoretical and practical problems of arts policy with the intent of formulating principles for a theory of arts policy as a contribution toward resolving these problems.
520 $a The study focuses on three key parties of interest: artists, citizens, and the state using the National Endowment for the Arts as a primary case study. Through discursive analysis, the underlying philosophical principles of arts policy are exposed, considered, and become the basis for developing key principles toward a theory of arts policy.
590 $a School code: 0047.
650 4 $a Political Science, Public Administration. $3 1017438
650 4 $a Philosophy. $3 516511
690 $a 0617
690 $a 0422
710 2 0 $a The Claremont Graduate University. $3 1017403
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 64-04A.
790 1 0 $a Young, Charles, $e advisor
790 $a 0047
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2003
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3086741