東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Using handheld computers for constan...

Obenschain, Faye Bland.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Using handheld computers for constant daily review in sixth grade mathematics.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Using handheld computers for constant daily review in sixth grade mathematics./
作者:	Obenschain, Faye Bland.
面頁冊數:	165 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-04, Section: A, page: 1232.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International71-04A.
標題:	Education, Mathematics. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3405516
ISBN:	9781109714227

Using handheld computers for constant daily review in sixth grade mathematics.
Obenschain, Faye Bland.

Using handheld computers for constant daily review in sixth grade mathematics. - 165 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-04, Section: A, page: 1232.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--George Mason University, 2010.

This mixed methods study compared mathematics achievement after students reviewed using handheld computer games or using teacher-led reviews. A total of 54 sixth grade students were involved in the study. The study examined achievement by ability level and student gender.

ISBN: 9781109714227Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017588
Education, Mathematics.

Using handheld computers for constant daily review in sixth grade mathematics.
LDR:03542nam 2200325 4500 001 1405928
005 20111213102338.5
008 130515s2010 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781109714227
035 $a (UMI)AAI3405516
035 $a AAI3405516
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Obenschain, Faye Bland. $3 1685351
245 1 0 $a Using handheld computers for constant daily review in sixth grade mathematics.
300 $a 165 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-04, Section: A, page: 1232.
500 $a Adviser: Margret Hjalmarson.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--George Mason University, 2010.
520 $a This mixed methods study compared mathematics achievement after students reviewed using handheld computer games or using teacher-led reviews. A total of 54 sixth grade students were involved in the study. The study examined achievement by ability level and student gender.
520 $a The study occurred in one semester time frame during regular school hours in a public middle school. Students participated during their regularly scheduled mathematics classes. Each day in mathematics class, the students reviewed previous concepts taught to help keep the concepts easily accessible to the students' memory. This is usually accomplished by the teacher leading the review using a projector to ask questions. This was the teacher-led type of review. During the intervention, instead of completing the teacher-led daily review, the students used the same amount of time each day in class to review mathematical concepts using the handheld computers. The units were alternated with handheld computer units being first, third, and fifth; whereas, teacher-led reviews were conducted during the second, fourth, and sixth units. The research questions were examined across multiple units and within each mathematical unit.
520 $a A within-group equivalent time series design was employed. The three different ability groups were compared across their own achievements over time. They were compared to themselves; not a different comparison group. Quantitatively, a pretestposttest design with multiple measures was used to measure students' retention of mathematical concepts for low-ability, average-ability, and high-ability learners and for male and female learners. A delayed posttest was used to analyze retention later in the school year. Qualitatively, the teacher kept a journal that contained questions primarily about game design and observations of students' perceptions.
520 $a Overall, students who reviewed using the handheld computer mathematical games obtained a mean gain score on unit 1, unit 3, and unit 5 tests of 82.28 (SD = 30.00) and students who reviewed using the teacher-led reviews obtained a mean gain score on unit 2, unit 4, and unit 6 tests of 58.81 (SD = 45.64). Results from the paired samples t-test were statistically significant, t(52) = 4.42, p<.001. For student ability, this study showed that average-ability students using handheld computer mathematical review games do retain more mathematical content on unit tests. As for gender, average-ability female students using handheld computer mathematical review games retained more mathematical content on unit tests.
590 $a School code: 0883.
650 4 $a Education, Mathematics. $3 1017588
650 4 $a Education, Middle School. $3 1030813
650 4 $a Education, Technology of. $3 1018012
690 $a 0280
690 $a 0450
690 $a 0710
710 2 $a George Mason University. $3 1019450
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 71-04A.
790 1 0 $a Hjalmarson, Margret, $e advisor
790 $a 0883
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2010
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3405516