東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

A qualitative program evaluation of ...

Teller, Romney P.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

A qualitative program evaluation of a structured leadership mentoring program at a large aerospace corporation.

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	A qualitative program evaluation of a structured leadership mentoring program at a large aerospace corporation./
Author:	Teller, Romney P.
Description:	157 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-06, Section: A, page: .
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International72-06A.
Subject:	Education, Leadership. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3448981
ISBN:	9781124553344

A qualitative program evaluation of a structured leadership mentoring program at a large aerospace corporation.
Teller, Romney P.

A qualitative program evaluation of a structured leadership mentoring program at a large aerospace corporation. - 157 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-06, Section: A, page: .

Thesis (Ed.D.)--Pepperdine University, 2011.

The researcher utilized a qualitative approach to conduct a program evaluation of the organization where he is employed. The study intended to serve as a program evaluation for the structured in-house mentoring program at a large aerospace corporation (A-Corp). This program evaluation clarified areas in which the current mentoring program is lacking and could be improved to align with best practices for mentoring that have been identified in the research literature. As a participant observer, the researcher used telephone focus groups as the main data source. A secondary data source included documents such as the training manual and intranet descriptions of the program. Conclusions are discussed as follows: (a) the formal mentoring program offered several important benefits to mentees, mentors, and the company; (b) areas in which the mentoring program matches the best practices noted in the literature, according to participant responses and training materials reviewed by the researcher, in table format; and (c) a list summarizes what participants stated as the areas needing improvement, and this list is used as the basis for organizing the recommendations for practical applications.

ISBN: 9781124553344Subjects--Topical Terms:

1035576
Education, Leadership.

A qualitative program evaluation of a structured leadership mentoring program at a large aerospace corporation.
LDR:02254nam 2200325 4500 001 1405763
005 20111214134951.5
008 130515s2011 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781124553344
035 $a (UMI)AAI3448981
035 $a AAI3448981
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Teller, Romney P. $3 1685174
245 1 2 $a A qualitative program evaluation of a structured leadership mentoring program at a large aerospace corporation.
300 $a 157 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-06, Section: A, page: .
500 $a Adviser: Susan Parks.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--Pepperdine University, 2011.
520 $a The researcher utilized a qualitative approach to conduct a program evaluation of the organization where he is employed. The study intended to serve as a program evaluation for the structured in-house mentoring program at a large aerospace corporation (A-Corp). This program evaluation clarified areas in which the current mentoring program is lacking and could be improved to align with best practices for mentoring that have been identified in the research literature. As a participant observer, the researcher used telephone focus groups as the main data source. A secondary data source included documents such as the training manual and intranet descriptions of the program. Conclusions are discussed as follows: (a) the formal mentoring program offered several important benefits to mentees, mentors, and the company; (b) areas in which the mentoring program matches the best practices noted in the literature, according to participant responses and training materials reviewed by the researcher, in table format; and (c) a list summarizes what participants stated as the areas needing improvement, and this list is used as the basis for organizing the recommendations for practical applications.
590 $a School code: 6009.
650 4 $a Education, Leadership. $3 1035576
650 4 $a Business Administration, Management. $3 626628
650 4 $a Speech Communication. $3 1017408
650 4 $a Education, Adult and Continuing. $3 626632
690 $a 0449
690 $a 0454
690 $a 0459
690 $a 0516
710 2 $a Pepperdine University. $b Education. $3 1019295
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 72-06A.
790 1 0 $a Parks, Susan, $e advisor
790 1 0 $a Armstrong, Kim $e committee member
790 1 0 $a Purrington, Linda $e committee member
790 $a 6009
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 2011
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3448981