東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

How persuasive is qualitative manage...

Hart, Matthew.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

How persuasive is qualitative management guidance compared to quantitative guidance?

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	How persuasive is qualitative management guidance compared to quantitative guidance?/
作者:	Hart, Matthew.
面頁冊數:	65 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-05, Section: A, page: 1702.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International71-05A.
標題:	Business Administration, Accounting. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3407111
ISBN:	9781109743302

How persuasive is qualitative management guidance compared to quantitative guidance?
Hart, Matthew.

How persuasive is qualitative management guidance compared to quantitative guidance? - 65 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-05, Section: A, page: 1702.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Arizona State University, 2010.

Management earnings guidance is one of the primary sources of earnings expectations for market participants. Broadly speaking, managers disclose their guidance either quantitatively or qualitatively. Comparing these guidance forms by type of news, I find that qualitative bad news forecasts are more persuasive to investors (i.e., have a stronger market reaction) and analysts (i.e., have larger earnings revisions) than quantitative bad news forecasts. With respect to good news earnings forecasts, I find no effect of guidance form. By way of an explanation, I find that qualitative bad news forecasts are more accurate ex post than quantitative bad news forecasts. Empirical results indicate that investors view qualitative bad news forecasts as a signal that the forthcoming earnings surprise may be more negative than anticipated. This result contrasts with prior studies which generally find that more precise earnings guidance is more persuasive.

ISBN: 9781109743302Subjects--Topical Terms:

1020666
Business Administration, Accounting.

How persuasive is qualitative management guidance compared to quantitative guidance?
LDR:01829nam 2200265 4500 001 1404683
005 20111130125232.5
008 130515s2010 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781109743302
035 $a (UMI)AAI3407111
035 $a AAI3407111
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Hart, Matthew. $3 731561
245 1 0 $a How persuasive is qualitative management guidance compared to quantitative guidance?
300 $a 65 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-05, Section: A, page: 1702.
500 $a Adviser: Michael Mikhail.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Arizona State University, 2010.
520 $a Management earnings guidance is one of the primary sources of earnings expectations for market participants. Broadly speaking, managers disclose their guidance either quantitatively or qualitatively. Comparing these guidance forms by type of news, I find that qualitative bad news forecasts are more persuasive to investors (i.e., have a stronger market reaction) and analysts (i.e., have larger earnings revisions) than quantitative bad news forecasts. With respect to good news earnings forecasts, I find no effect of guidance form. By way of an explanation, I find that qualitative bad news forecasts are more accurate ex post than quantitative bad news forecasts. Empirical results indicate that investors view qualitative bad news forecasts as a signal that the forthcoming earnings surprise may be more negative than anticipated. This result contrasts with prior studies which generally find that more precise earnings guidance is more persuasive.
590 $a School code: 0010.
650 4 $a Business Administration, Accounting. $3 1020666
690 $a 0272
710 2 $a Arizona State University. $3 1017445
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 71-05A.
790 1 0 $a Mikhail, Michael, $e advisor
790 $a 0010
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2010
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3407111