東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Essays on Identity: A Defense of Log...

Gallegos, Sergio.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Essays on Identity: A Defense of Logical Orthodoxy.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Essays on Identity: A Defense of Logical Orthodoxy./
作者:	Gallegos, Sergio.
面頁冊數:	309 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-12, Section: A, page: .
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International72-12A.
標題:	Logic. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3469858
ISBN:	9781124862439

Essays on Identity: A Defense of Logical Orthodoxy.
Gallegos, Sergio.

Essays on Identity: A Defense of Logical Orthodoxy. - 309 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-12, Section: A, page: .

Thesis (Ph.D.)--City University of New York, 2011.

My dissertation defends a commonly accepted package involving a certain number of theses that lie at the intersection of metaphysics, philosophy of language and philosophy of logic. The package, which includes (i) the classical thesis that identity is a one-one relation that is absolute, necessary and determinate and (ii) the Kripkean theses that true identity statements involving only rigid designators are necessary and that proper names are rigid designators (along with the consequences of these two theses such as the view that true identity statements involving only proper names are necessary), occupies a central role in many philosophical discussions where it functions both as a sanction of certain avenues of inquiry and as a constraint on the development of others.

ISBN: 9781124862439Subjects--Topical Terms:

529544
Logic.

Essays on Identity: A Defense of Logical Orthodoxy.
LDR:03628nam 2200361 4500 001 1404642
005 20111130124108.5
008 130515s2011 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781124862439
035 $a (UMI)AAI3469858
035 $a AAI3469858
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Gallegos, Sergio. $3 1683977
245 1 0 $a Essays on Identity: A Defense of Logical Orthodoxy.
300 $a 309 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-12, Section: A, page: .
500 $a Adviser: Richard Mendelsohn.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--City University of New York, 2011.
520 $a My dissertation defends a commonly accepted package involving a certain number of theses that lie at the intersection of metaphysics, philosophy of language and philosophy of logic. The package, which includes (i) the classical thesis that identity is a one-one relation that is absolute, necessary and determinate and (ii) the Kripkean theses that true identity statements involving only rigid designators are necessary and that proper names are rigid designators (along with the consequences of these two theses such as the view that true identity statements involving only proper names are necessary), occupies a central role in many philosophical discussions where it functions both as a sanction of certain avenues of inquiry and as a constraint on the development of others.
520 $a In spite of its inner consistency and overwhelming persuasiveness, the package has been criticized from many different angles. For instance, some philosophers claim that there are many different identity relations relativized to different sorts of things rather than an absolute identity relation because the latter view is undermined by paradoxes. Others maintain that, pace Kripke, there are true contingent identity statements involving only proper names because the reference of a proper name in a counterfactual situation is given by a sortal concept associated to it. Furthermore, some hold that identity is indeterminate in certain circumstances because the strongest arguments that aim to show the inconsistency of the view that identity is indeterminate may be blocked successfully.
520 $a The first chapter of my dissertation is concerned with answering the challenge raised against the absolute character of identity. After reviewing the traditional considerations put forward by relative identity theorists as well as some novel arguments, I conclude that identity is absolute. In the second chapter, I consider in detail some of the most prominent arguments given to maintain that there are true contingent identity statements involving proper names as well as an argument given to show that the proof of the necessity of identity involves a vicious circularity and I show that all the arguments involve serious flaws, thus clearing of doubts the Kripkean portion of the package. The third chapter vindicates the view that indeterminate identity is inconsistent by providing a defense of Evans' argument for the inconsistency of indeterminate identity against a number of objections that have been addressed to it.
590 $a School code: 0046.
650 4 $a Logic. $3 529544
650 4 $a Metaphysics. $3 517082
650 4 $a Language, General. $3 1018089
690 $a 0395
690 $a 0396
690 $a 0679
710 2 $a City University of New York. $b Philosophy. $3 1030648
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 72-12A.
790 1 0 $a Mendelsohn, Richard, $e advisor
790 1 0 $a Koslow, Arnold $e committee member
790 1 0 $a Cordero, Alberto $e committee member
790 1 0 $a Greenwood, John $e committee member
790 1 0 $a Montero, Barbara $e committee member
790 $a 0046
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2011
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3469858