東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Archaeotype: Reasoning in the contex...

Dimaraki, Evangelia.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Archaeotype: Reasoning in the context of computer-based archeological excavation in the classroom.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Archaeotype: Reasoning in the context of computer-based archeological excavation in the classroom./
作者:	Dimaraki, Evangelia.
面頁冊數:	368 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-10, Section: A, page: 3561.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International71-10A.
標題:	Education, Instructional Design. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3424969
ISBN:	9781124254456

Archaeotype: Reasoning in the context of computer-based archeological excavation in the classroom.
Dimaraki, Evangelia.

Archaeotype: Reasoning in the context of computer-based archeological excavation in the classroom. - 368 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-10, Section: A, page: 3561.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--Teachers College, Columbia University, 2010.

The present study documents dialogic reasoning in the context of the interpretive inquiry-based learning task of Archaeotype, a computer-supported environment for learning ancient history that revolves around two simulated archaeological excavations, the first set in Assyria and the second set in Greece. The study focuses on teacher-led and peer discussions that occur concurrently with classroom engagement in the Archaeotype excavations and examines how evidence-based interpretive reasoning is enacted in dialog.

ISBN: 9781124254456Subjects--Topical Terms:

1669073
Education, Instructional Design.

Archaeotype: Reasoning in the context of computer-based archeological excavation in the classroom.
LDR:03517nam 2200349 4500 001 1403979
005 20111116122852.5
008 130515s2010 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781124254456
035 $a (UMI)AAI3424969
035 $a AAI3424969
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Dimaraki, Evangelia. $3 1683273
245 1 0 $a Archaeotype: Reasoning in the context of computer-based archeological excavation in the classroom.
300 $a 368 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-10, Section: A, page: 3561.
500 $a Adviser: John Black.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--Teachers College, Columbia University, 2010.
520 $a The present study documents dialogic reasoning in the context of the interpretive inquiry-based learning task of Archaeotype, a computer-supported environment for learning ancient history that revolves around two simulated archaeological excavations, the first set in Assyria and the second set in Greece. The study focuses on teacher-led and peer discussions that occur concurrently with classroom engagement in the Archaeotype excavations and examines how evidence-based interpretive reasoning is enacted in dialog.
520 $a The data for the study comprise a sequence of discussions recorded over the course of both Archaeotype excavations in two dialogic situations: symposia and dyad discussions. Symposia are periodic whole-class, teacher-led discussions, recorded in the classroom as they normally occur. Dyad discussions are a peer dialogic situation introduced for the needs of the study and conducted repeatedly with the same students in weekly intervals. Data analysis employed a template-driven, iterative procedure of indexing and annotating the dialog transcripts, informed by the grounded theory methodology. A year of daily immersion into the Archaeotype classroom prior to focused data collection was instrumental to the analysis.
520 $a The study documented that reasoning in Archaeotype involves a variety of argument forms. While some of these argument forms diverge from a normative model of evidence-based reasoning, Archaeotype participants used them productively to advance their inquiry.
520 $a Further, the study documented that the students enacted the overtly uniform dyad task differently in the course of each simulated excavation, as evinced from both reasoning and discursive patterns. In addition, each student developed a distinct individual orientation to the reasoning task.
520 $a Differences were also documented between the two excavations in the way the teacher orchestrated the symposia. She created different participation structures for the students in framing the symposia discussion and she emphasized reasoning demands that defined two distinct modes of reasoning: reconstruction and argumentation.
520 $a This research sets evidence-based reasoning in inquiry learning that is interpretive, within a unifying framework of reasoning as argument. Further, it demonstrates that, in considering the cognitive dimensions of reasoning fostered in computer-supported inquiry learning environments, closer attention needs to be paid to how the cognitive task is defined by participants in discourse.
590 $a School code: 0055.
650 4 $a Education, Instructional Design. $3 1669073
650 4 $a Education, Pedagogy. $3 1669025
650 4 $a Education, Educational Psychology. $3 1017560
690 $a 0447
690 $a 0456
690 $a 0525
710 2 $a Teachers College, Columbia University. $3 1018028
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 71-10A.
790 1 0 $a Black, John, $e advisor
790 $a 0055
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 2010
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3424969