東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

State legislative reactions to No Ch...

Collins, William J.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

State legislative reactions to No Child Left Behind: Education leaders in three states.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	State legislative reactions to No Child Left Behind: Education leaders in three states./
作者:	Collins, William J.
面頁冊數:	164 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-10, Section: A, page: 3597.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International71-10A.
標題:	Education, Policy. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3419447
ISBN:	9781124193991

State legislative reactions to No Child Left Behind: Education leaders in three states.
Collins, William J.

State legislative reactions to No Child Left Behind: Education leaders in three states. - 164 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-10, Section: A, page: 3597.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--University of Kansas, 2010.

This dissertation examines the historical background of federal regulations that have expanded over the past thirty years, and their impact on state legislative resistance to No Child Left Behind (NCLB). The federal government's involvement in public education offers an instructive opportunity for inquiry into cooperative federalism. State resistance to NCLB provides an example for study when considering state reactions to federal regulations and ensuing intergovernmental conflicts in regard to public education. This study focuses on legislative responses to NCLB, with reactions from legislators from Kansas, Missouri, and Colorado. The investigation is drawn from interviews conducted with state legislators from these three states. Some common threads emerged from the interviews and from a review of the related literature. One includes the question of the constitutionality of NCLB and a power struggle that exists in public education between various levels of government. In light of state challenges to NCLB legislation, a number of consistent factors of resistance were evidenced by the states. These state legislative reactions offer significant insight for challenges facing future public education federal legislation, and may be useful as a model of study for examining state reactions in the years ahead.

ISBN: 9781124193991Subjects--Topical Terms:

1669130
Education, Policy.

State legislative reactions to No Child Left Behind: Education leaders in three states.
LDR:02436nam 2200337 4500 001 1403975
005 20111116122850.5
008 130515s2010 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781124193991
035 $a (UMI)AAI3419447
035 $a AAI3419447
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Collins, William J. $3 1683269
245 1 0 $a State legislative reactions to No Child Left Behind: Education leaders in three states.
300 $a 164 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-10, Section: A, page: 3597.
500 $a Adviser: John L. Rury.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--University of Kansas, 2010.
520 $a This dissertation examines the historical background of federal regulations that have expanded over the past thirty years, and their impact on state legislative resistance to No Child Left Behind (NCLB). The federal government's involvement in public education offers an instructive opportunity for inquiry into cooperative federalism. State resistance to NCLB provides an example for study when considering state reactions to federal regulations and ensuing intergovernmental conflicts in regard to public education. This study focuses on legislative responses to NCLB, with reactions from legislators from Kansas, Missouri, and Colorado. The investigation is drawn from interviews conducted with state legislators from these three states. Some common threads emerged from the interviews and from a review of the related literature. One includes the question of the constitutionality of NCLB and a power struggle that exists in public education between various levels of government. In light of state challenges to NCLB legislation, a number of consistent factors of resistance were evidenced by the states. These state legislative reactions offer significant insight for challenges facing future public education federal legislation, and may be useful as a model of study for examining state reactions in the years ahead.
590 $a School code: 0099.
650 4 $a Education, Policy. $3 1669130
650 4 $a Education, Administration. $3 626645
650 4 $a Education, Social Sciences. $3 1019148
690 $a 0458
690 $a 0514
690 $a 0534
710 2 $a University of Kansas. $b Educational Leadership and Policy Studies. $3 1023265
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 71-10A.
790 1 0 $a Rury, John L., $e advisor
790 1 0 $a Perkins, Perry $e committee member
790 1 0 $a Barry, Arlene $e committee member
790 1 0 $a Saatcioglu, Argun $e committee member
790 1 0 $a Wolf-Wendel, Lisa $e committee member
790 $a 0099
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 2010
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3419447