東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The state of integrated open space p...

Ex, Lindsay.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The state of integrated open space planning: Toward landscape integrity?

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The state of integrated open space planning: Toward landscape integrity?/
作者:	Ex, Lindsay.
面頁冊數:	219 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 49-02, page: 0736.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International49-02.
標題:	Landscape Architecture. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1482769
ISBN:	9781124309194

The state of integrated open space planning: Toward landscape integrity?
Ex, Lindsay.

The state of integrated open space planning: Toward landscape integrity? - 219 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 49-02, page: 0736.

Thesis (M.L.A.)--Utah State University, 2010.

Open space planning has been present within the United States for over a century. Traditionally, open space planning efforts tend to focus more exclusively on either socially-based (e.g., recreational, scenic, or park planning) or ecologically-based (e.g., preserves, habitat networks or more general conservation planning) planning efforts. This separation of ecological and social frameworks in open space planning is reinforced by a persistent cultural model, where community and conservation are seen as opposing forces instead of partners.

ISBN: 9781124309194Subjects--Topical Terms:

890923
Landscape Architecture.

The state of integrated open space planning: Toward landscape integrity?
LDR:03938nam 2200349 4500 001 1403257
005 20111111141849.5
008 130515s2010 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781124309194
035 $a (UMI)AAI1482769
035 $a AAI1482769
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Ex, Lindsay. $3 1682512
245 1 4 $a The state of integrated open space planning: Toward landscape integrity?
300 $a 219 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 49-02, page: 0736.
500 $a Adviser: Carlos V. Licon.
502 $a Thesis (M.L.A.)--Utah State University, 2010.
520 $a Open space planning has been present within the United States for over a century. Traditionally, open space planning efforts tend to focus more exclusively on either socially-based (e.g., recreational, scenic, or park planning) or ecologically-based (e.g., preserves, habitat networks or more general conservation planning) planning efforts. This separation of ecological and social frameworks in open space planning is reinforced by a persistent cultural model, where community and conservation are seen as opposing forces instead of partners.
520 $a While recent open space planning efforts have begun to integrate social and ecological frameworks into one plan, the majority of our knowledge on integrated open space planning comes from individual case studies. Thus, a synthesized toolbox for how to practice this planning field is lacking. Given this lack of synthesized knowledge of integrated open space planning, an exploratory effort was undertaken to begin to view this newer planning field through a comprehensive lens. The goal of this research was to identify the state of integrated open space planning and begin to assess whether this state was leading toward "landscape integrity," which suggests that healthy social and ecological systems must function together to be sustainable.
520 $a Framed within an adapted Pressure-State-Response framework, this thesis employed mixed methods and multiple perspectives to engender a holistic framework that identifies the pressures, state of, and potential responses surrounding integrated open space planning. Pressures synthesized from practice and theory include key barriers and facilitators to achieving integration. For the first time, the state of integrated open space planning has been identified from a synthesis of thirty planning processes, practices, and tools utilized in this new planning field. This framework provides planners with a framework upon which sharing and communication can now take place regarding how integrated open space planning can be institutionalized. Finally, this understanding of the pressures and state reveals potential responses for this newer planning field, including the need for increased collaboration to build this new field of open space planning into a mainstream planning field and increased research into bridging the gaps between theory and practice identified through this thesis.
520 $a This study found two integrated open space planning models and a breadth of literature supporting a movement away from the community versus conservation dichotomy. While this movement is not yet mainstream, both paradigm shifts and the rapidly changing landscapes in which we live are reinforcing this trend. With the expanded view and holistic framework illustrated by this research, planners are afforded a similar language upon which they can discuss the tools and processes central to integrated open space planning.
590 $a School code: 0241.
650 4 $a Landscape Architecture. $3 890923
650 4 $a Land Use Planning. $3 1673684
650 4 $a Urban and Regional Planning. $3 1017841
690 $a 0390
690 $a 0536
690 $a 0999
710 2 $a Utah State University. $b Landscape Architecture and Environmental Planning. $3 1026681
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 49-02.
790 1 0 $a Licon, Carlos V., $e advisor
790 1 0 $a Lavoie, Caroline M.N $e committee member
790 1 0 $a Bissonette, John A. $e committee member
790 $a 0241
791 $a M.L.A.
792 $a 2010
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1482769