東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Case studies of multidisciplinary ch...

Smith, Teresa M.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Case studies of multidisciplinary child abuse case review teams and their leaders in children's advocacy centers in Pennsylvania.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Case studies of multidisciplinary child abuse case review teams and their leaders in children's advocacy centers in Pennsylvania./
作者:	Smith, Teresa M.
面頁冊數:	240 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-07, Section: A, page: .
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International72-07A.
標題:	Social Work. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3453625
ISBN:	9781124619323

Case studies of multidisciplinary child abuse case review teams and their leaders in children's advocacy centers in Pennsylvania.
Smith, Teresa M.

Case studies of multidisciplinary child abuse case review teams and their leaders in children's advocacy centers in Pennsylvania. - 240 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-07, Section: A, page: .

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Indiana University of Pennsylvania, 2011.

Child abuse is a multi-system problem in that different agencies are charged with different responsibilities in its investigation, evaluation, intervention and treatment. This study explored the roles and relationships of team leaders and team members on child abuse case review teams in Children's Advocacy Centers (CACs) in Pennsylvania. The CAC model has been shown to be a successful collaborative community response to child abuse. This study reviewed the historical background of child abuse and the progression of society's response in developing a collaborative approach. The multidisciplinary team, as it became known, is critical to identifying and managing cases of child abuse. Multidisciplinary team members coordinate services to address issues that cannot effectively be solved by only one system's interaction.

ISBN: 9781124619323Subjects--Topical Terms:

617587
Social Work.

Case studies of multidisciplinary child abuse case review teams and their leaders in children's advocacy centers in Pennsylvania.
LDR:02992nam 2200337 4500 001 1402749
005 20111103085940.5
008 130515s2011 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781124619323
035 $a (UMI)AAI3453625
035 $a AAI3453625
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Smith, Teresa M. $3 1681963
245 1 0 $a Case studies of multidisciplinary child abuse case review teams and their leaders in children's advocacy centers in Pennsylvania.
300 $a 240 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-07, Section: A, page: .
500 $a Adviser: Robert Heasley.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Indiana University of Pennsylvania, 2011.
520 $a Child abuse is a multi-system problem in that different agencies are charged with different responsibilities in its investigation, evaluation, intervention and treatment. This study explored the roles and relationships of team leaders and team members on child abuse case review teams in Children's Advocacy Centers (CACs) in Pennsylvania. The CAC model has been shown to be a successful collaborative community response to child abuse. This study reviewed the historical background of child abuse and the progression of society's response in developing a collaborative approach. The multidisciplinary team, as it became known, is critical to identifying and managing cases of child abuse. Multidisciplinary team members coordinate services to address issues that cannot effectively be solved by only one system's interaction.
520 $a Understanding the leadership of multidisciplinary teams and the roles and responsibilities of the team members has been the focus of this research. An important aspect of the integrated CAC model is the case review process. My findings from the qualitative methods used in this study have highlighted the qualities of trust, respect and commitment as important in establishing and sustaining effective multidisciplinary child abuse teams. In addition, key components for consideration included: alignment of foundational documents, leadership quality, meeting location, meeting attendance and participation, and leadership boundaries. Team leaders and members value the collaborative process and voiced expectations of discipline representation, attendance and participation in case review meetings. These results will inform existing CACs and developing programs, as well as other private sector and non-profit agencies of the benefits of team member and leader acceptance of divergent perspectives and open communication in how to best manage collaborative teams.
590 $a School code: 0318.
650 4 $a Social Work. $3 617587
650 4 $a Sociology, Criminology and Penology. $3 1017569
650 4 $a Sociology, Public and Social Welfare. $3 1017909
650 4 $a Sociology, Organizational. $3 1018023
690 $a 0452
690 $a 0627
690 $a 0630
690 $a 0703
710 2 $a Indiana University of Pennsylvania. $b Sociology. $3 1044500
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 72-07A.
790 1 0 $a Heasley, Robert, $e advisor
790 1 0 $a Crane, Betsy $e committee member
790 1 0 $a Seibert, Wade $e committee member
790 $a 0318
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2011
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3453625