東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

A Study of Statistical Power and Typ...

Olivera Aguilar, Margarita.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

A Study of Statistical Power and Type I Errors in Testing a Factor Analytic Model for Group Differences in Regression Intercepts.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	A Study of Statistical Power and Type I Errors in Testing a Factor Analytic Model for Group Differences in Regression Intercepts./
作者:	Olivera Aguilar, Margarita.
面頁冊數:	75 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 49-02, page: 1417.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International49-02.
標題:	Psychology, General. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1482999
ISBN:	9781124339375

A Study of Statistical Power and Type I Errors in Testing a Factor Analytic Model for Group Differences in Regression Intercepts.
Olivera Aguilar, Margarita.

A Study of Statistical Power and Type I Errors in Testing a Factor Analytic Model for Group Differences in Regression Intercepts. - 75 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 49-02, page: 1417.

Thesis (M.A.)--Arizona State University, 2010.

In the past, it has been assumed that measurement and predictive invariance are consistent so that if one form of invariance holds the other form should also hold. However, some studies have proven that both forms of invariance only hold under certain conditions such as factorial invariance and invariance in the common factor variances. The present research examined Type I errors and the statistical power of a method that detects violations to the factorial invariant model in the presence of group differences in regression intercepts, under different sample sizes and different number of predictors (one or two). Data were simulated under two models: in model A only differences in the factor means were allowed, while model B violated invariance. A factorial invariant model was fitted to the data. Type I errors were defined as the proportion of samples in which the hypothesis of invariance was incorrectly rejected, and statistical power was defined as the proportion of samples in which the hypothesis of factorial invariance was correctly rejected. In the case of one predictor, the results show that the chi-square statistic has low power to detect violations to the model. Unexpected and systematic results were obtained regarding the negative unique variance in the predictor. It is proposed that negative unique variance in the predictor can be used as indication of measurement bias instead of the chi-square fit statistic with sample sizes of 500 or more. The results of the two predictor case show larger power. In both cases Type I errors were as expected. The implications of the results and some suggestions for increasing the power of the method are provided.

ISBN: 9781124339375Subjects--Topical Terms:

1018034
Psychology, General.

A Study of Statistical Power and Type I Errors in Testing a Factor Analytic Model for Group Differences in Regression Intercepts.
LDR:02702nam 2200301 4500 001 1402571
005 20111102140039.5
008 130515s2010 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781124339375
035 $a (UMI)AAI1482999
035 $a AAI1482999
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Olivera Aguilar, Margarita. $3 1681767
245 1 2 $a A Study of Statistical Power and Type I Errors in Testing a Factor Analytic Model for Group Differences in Regression Intercepts.
300 $a 75 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 49-02, page: 1417.
500 $a Adviser: Roger E. Millsap.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--Arizona State University, 2010.
520 $a In the past, it has been assumed that measurement and predictive invariance are consistent so that if one form of invariance holds the other form should also hold. However, some studies have proven that both forms of invariance only hold under certain conditions such as factorial invariance and invariance in the common factor variances. The present research examined Type I errors and the statistical power of a method that detects violations to the factorial invariant model in the presence of group differences in regression intercepts, under different sample sizes and different number of predictors (one or two). Data were simulated under two models: in model A only differences in the factor means were allowed, while model B violated invariance. A factorial invariant model was fitted to the data. Type I errors were defined as the proportion of samples in which the hypothesis of invariance was incorrectly rejected, and statistical power was defined as the proportion of samples in which the hypothesis of factorial invariance was correctly rejected. In the case of one predictor, the results show that the chi-square statistic has low power to detect violations to the model. Unexpected and systematic results were obtained regarding the negative unique variance in the predictor. It is proposed that negative unique variance in the predictor can be used as indication of measurement bias instead of the chi-square fit statistic with sample sizes of 500 or more. The results of the two predictor case show larger power. In both cases Type I errors were as expected. The implications of the results and some suggestions for increasing the power of the method are provided.
590 $a School code: 0010.
650 4 $a Psychology, General. $3 1018034
650 4 $a Psychology, Psychometrics. $3 1017742
690 $a 0621
690 $a 0632
710 2 $a Arizona State University. $b Psychology. $3 1677434
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 49-02.
790 1 0 $a Millsap, Roger E., $e advisor
790 1 0 $a Aiken, Leona S. $e committee member
790 1 0 $a Enders, Craig K. $e committee member
790 $a 0010
791 $a M.A.
792 $a 2010
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1482999