東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

An analysis of First Amendment juris...

Herzog, Alexander John.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

An analysis of First Amendment jurisprudence on the Supreme Court case of Locke v. Davey.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	An analysis of First Amendment jurisprudence on the Supreme Court case of Locke v. Davey./
作者:	Herzog, Alexander John.
面頁冊數:	211 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-08, Section: A, page: 2824.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International71-08A.
標題:	Law. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3412373
ISBN:	9781124105659

An analysis of First Amendment jurisprudence on the Supreme Court case of Locke v. Davey.
Herzog, Alexander John.

An analysis of First Amendment jurisprudence on the Supreme Court case of Locke v. Davey. - 211 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-08, Section: A, page: 2824.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--University of Nevada, Las Vegas, 2010.

Scholarship programs authored by state legislatures may conflict with a state's constitution. In the case of Locke v. Davey 540 U.S. 807 (2003), Joshua Davey challenged the State of Washington's withdrawal of his Promise Scholarship claiming violation of his First Amendment rights under the United States Constitution.

ISBN: 9781124105659Subjects--Topical Terms:

600858
Law.

An analysis of First Amendment jurisprudence on the Supreme Court case of Locke v. Davey.
LDR:03252nam 2200373 4500 001 1402153
005 20111028105738.5
008 130515s2010 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781124105659
035 $a (UMI)AAI3412373
035 $a AAI3412373
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Herzog, Alexander John. $3 1681311
245 1 3 $a An analysis of First Amendment jurisprudence on the Supreme Court case of Locke v. Davey.
300 $a 211 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-08, Section: A, page: 2824.
500 $a Adviser: Gerald C. Kops.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--University of Nevada, Las Vegas, 2010.
520 $a Scholarship programs authored by state legislatures may conflict with a state's constitution. In the case of Locke v. Davey 540 U.S. 807 (2003), Joshua Davey challenged the State of Washington's withdrawal of his Promise Scholarship claiming violation of his First Amendment rights under the United States Constitution.
520 $a This historical case study analyzes the Supreme Court jurisprudence regarding legal issues concerning the issuance of state funded scholarships for the purpose of religious studies. The study included a review of all relevant court cases, court filings, legal journals and legal briefs.
520 $a Synthesizing this information provided a refined understanding of the implications of the Establishment Clause and Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment and the impact of this case on federal and state funded scholarship programs. An analysis of the impact of Locke and other relevant decisions is offered to state administrators of scholarships that are publicly funded so that administrators may review and adjust their policies in accordance with legal precedent.
520 $a A micro legal analysis of Justice Rehnquist's opinion was also performed using the judicial decision making template formulated by Judge Benjamin N. Cardozo describing a general process for judicial decision making. Chief Justice Rehnquist's opinion in the Locke v. Davey case was examined using the template to determine whether his decision making approach is congruent with the advice of Judge Cardozo. (Cardozo 1921) The micro analysis of the decision indicated that Justice Rehnquist utilized the decision making template developed by Judge Cardozo.
520 $a A macro legal analysis was also implemented to determine if the decision in Locke v. Davey supported or refuted Jeffery Rosen's theory that the Supreme Court makes decisions based on public sentiment.(Rosen 2006). The macro legal analysis determined that the decision in Locke v. Davey could be credibly argued as supporting and refuting Rosen's theory thereby highlighting the imprecision of the theory and the need for further development of Rosen's theoretical framework.
590 $a School code: 0506.
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
650 4 $a Education, Policy. $3 1669130
650 4 $a Education, Administration. $3 626645
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0458
690 $a 0514
710 2 $a University of Nevada, Las Vegas. $b Education Leadership. $3 1678415
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 71-08A.
790 1 0 $a Kops, Gerald C., $e advisor
790 1 0 $a Carlton, Patrick $e committee member
790 1 0 $a Meacham, Paul $e committee member
790 1 0 $a Troutman, Porter $e committee member
790 $a 0506
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 2010
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3412373