東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

An East and West debate on human rights.

Chan, Benedict Shing Bun.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

An East and West debate on human rights.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	An East and West debate on human rights./
作者:	Chan, Benedict Shing Bun.
面頁冊數:	212 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-09, Section: A, page: .
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International72-09A.
標題:	Asian Studies. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3461501
ISBN:	9781124749433

An East and West debate on human rights.
Chan, Benedict Shing Bun.

An East and West debate on human rights. - 212 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-09, Section: A, page: .

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Maryland, College Park, 2011.

In an East and West debate on human rights, scholars from different cultures disagree on whether all civil and political rights are human rights. While they generally agree that basic civil rights such as rights against torture and slavery (i.e., physical security rights) are human rights, some of them argue that traditional political rights in the West such as freedom of speech and political participation (i.e., liberal rights) are not human rights. Some scholars, such as Daniel A. Bell, argue that liberal rights are not human rights because liberal rights conflict with some East Asian cultures. In this dissertation, I argue that both physical security rights and liberal rights are human rights, and explain the relationship between these rights and East Asian cultures.

ISBN: 9781124749433Subjects--Topical Terms:

1669375
Asian Studies.

An East and West debate on human rights.
LDR:03353nam 2200385 4500 001 1402039
005 20111020123636.5
008 130515s2011 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781124749433
035 $a (UMI)AAI3461501
035 $a AAI3461501
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Chan, Benedict Shing Bun. $3 1681191
245 1 3 $a An East and West debate on human rights.
300 $a 212 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-09, Section: A, page: .
500 $a Adviser: Christopher W. Morris.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Maryland, College Park, 2011.
520 $a In an East and West debate on human rights, scholars from different cultures disagree on whether all civil and political rights are human rights. While they generally agree that basic civil rights such as rights against torture and slavery (i.e., physical security rights) are human rights, some of them argue that traditional political rights in the West such as freedom of speech and political participation (i.e., liberal rights) are not human rights. Some scholars, such as Daniel A. Bell, argue that liberal rights are not human rights because liberal rights conflict with some East Asian cultures. In this dissertation, I argue that both physical security rights and liberal rights are human rights, and explain the relationship between these rights and East Asian cultures.
520 $a First, I argue that if liberal rights are not human rights because they conflict with some East Asian cultures, then physical security rights are also not human rights because physical security rights also conflict with some East Asian cultures.
520 $a Next, I discuss the idea from Daniel Bell and Michael Walzer that physical security rights are human rights because they are minimal values. Based on their idea, I explain what minimal values are, and why it is possible to develop some maximal theories of physical security rights in East Asian cultures. I argue that since physical security rights are minimal values, they are still human rights even they conflict with some East Asian cultures.
520 $a I then argue that liberal rights, similar to physical security rights, are also minimal values, and it is possible to develop some maximal theories of them in East Asian cultures. Therefore, similar to physical security rights, liberal rights are also human rights even they also conflict with some East Asian cultures.
520 $a I also discuss other human rights debates, especially the debates between Daniel Bell and other philosophers. Charles Taylor argues for an overlapping consensus approach on human rights; Jack Donnelly argues for a Western liberalist approach on human rights. I explain the relationship between these approaches and my arguments, and how my arguments can help them to reply to the challenges from Daniel Bell.
590 $a School code: 0117.
650 4 $a Asian Studies. $3 1669375
650 4 $a Ethics. $3 517264
650 4 $a Philosophy. $3 516511
690 $a 0342
690 $a 0394
690 $a 0422
710 2 $a University of Maryland, College Park. $b Philosophy. $3 1029753
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 72-09A.
790 1 0 $a Morris, Christopher W., $e advisor
790 1 0 $a Crocker, David $e committee member
790 1 0 $a Li, Xiaorong $e committee member
790 1 0 $a Moller, Dan $e committee member
790 1 0 $a Soltan, Karol $e committee member
790 $a 0117
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2011
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3461501