東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Establishing predictive validity for...

Megert, Brian R.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Establishing predictive validity for oral passage reading fluency and vocabulary curriculum-based measures (CBMs) for sixth grade students.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Establishing predictive validity for oral passage reading fluency and vocabulary curriculum-based measures (CBMs) for sixth grade students./
作者:	Megert, Brian R.
面頁冊數:	92 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-09, Section: A, page: 3187.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International71-09A.
標題:	Education, Tests and Measurements. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3420324
ISBN:	9781124163673

Establishing predictive validity for oral passage reading fluency and vocabulary curriculum-based measures (CBMs) for sixth grade students.
Megert, Brian R.

Establishing predictive validity for oral passage reading fluency and vocabulary curriculum-based measures (CBMs) for sixth grade students. - 92 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-09, Section: A, page: 3187.

Thesis (D.Ed.)--University of Oregon, 2010.

In recent years, state and national policy created the need for higher accountability standards for student academic performance. This increased accountability creates an imperative to have a formative assessment system reflecting validity in inferences about the effectiveness of instruction and performance on statewide large-scale assessments. Curriculum-based measurement (CBM) satisfies both functions. However, research shows the predictive power of oral passage reading fluency (PRF) diminishes in middle and high school. Because of the decreased predictive validity of PRF in the upper grade levels, additional reading CBMs should be explored. This study compares PRF and Vocabulary CBM data for all sixth grade students in a school district using two statistical procedures: correlation and regression. The correlation coefficients were moderately high among PRF, Vocabulary CBM, and the Reading test in Oregon Assessment of Knowledge and Skills (OAKS). A regression analysis indicated that the Vocabulary CBM explained more variance than PRF in predicting reading performance on OAKS. A second multiple regression analysis introduced three non-performance indicators (Gender, Attendance, and NCLB At-Risk), along with the two CBMs (Vocabulary and PRF). The second regression results revealed that Vocabulary again was more predictive than PRF, Gender, Attendance, or NCLB At-Risk. At-Risk status was the only non-performance indicator that was significant. All the findings have been discussed within the context of understanding reading skills using CBMs and their relation to performance on a large-scale test used for accountability. The findings have been framed as part of an information system that allows schools and districts to better tailor staffing, instruction, and schedules to student needs. Suggestions for future research also have been discussed, particularly in enhancing the predictions on large-scale test outcomes using a variety of CBMs.

ISBN: 9781124163673Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017589
Education, Tests and Measurements.

Establishing predictive validity for oral passage reading fluency and vocabulary curriculum-based measures (CBMs) for sixth grade students.
LDR:02935nam 2200289 4500 001 1401432
005 20111020091953.5
008 130515s2010 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781124163673
035 $a (UMI)AAI3420324
035 $a AAI3420324
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Megert, Brian R. $3 1680565
245 1 0 $a Establishing predictive validity for oral passage reading fluency and vocabulary curriculum-based measures (CBMs) for sixth grade students.
300 $a 92 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-09, Section: A, page: 3187.
500 $a Adviser: Gerald Tindal.
502 $a Thesis (D.Ed.)--University of Oregon, 2010.
520 $a In recent years, state and national policy created the need for higher accountability standards for student academic performance. This increased accountability creates an imperative to have a formative assessment system reflecting validity in inferences about the effectiveness of instruction and performance on statewide large-scale assessments. Curriculum-based measurement (CBM) satisfies both functions. However, research shows the predictive power of oral passage reading fluency (PRF) diminishes in middle and high school. Because of the decreased predictive validity of PRF in the upper grade levels, additional reading CBMs should be explored. This study compares PRF and Vocabulary CBM data for all sixth grade students in a school district using two statistical procedures: correlation and regression. The correlation coefficients were moderately high among PRF, Vocabulary CBM, and the Reading test in Oregon Assessment of Knowledge and Skills (OAKS). A regression analysis indicated that the Vocabulary CBM explained more variance than PRF in predicting reading performance on OAKS. A second multiple regression analysis introduced three non-performance indicators (Gender, Attendance, and NCLB At-Risk), along with the two CBMs (Vocabulary and PRF). The second regression results revealed that Vocabulary again was more predictive than PRF, Gender, Attendance, or NCLB At-Risk. At-Risk status was the only non-performance indicator that was significant. All the findings have been discussed within the context of understanding reading skills using CBMs and their relation to performance on a large-scale test used for accountability. The findings have been framed as part of an information system that allows schools and districts to better tailor staffing, instruction, and schedules to student needs. Suggestions for future research also have been discussed, particularly in enhancing the predictions on large-scale test outcomes using a variety of CBMs.
590 $a School code: 0171.
650 4 $a Education, Tests and Measurements. $3 1017589
650 4 $a Education, Leadership. $3 1035576
650 4 $a Education, Reading. $3 1017790
690 $a 0288
690 $a 0449
690 $a 0535
710 2 $a University of Oregon. $3 958250
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 71-09A.
790 1 0 $a Tindal, Gerald, $e advisor
790 $a 0171
791 $a D.Ed.
792 $a 2010
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3420324