東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Beyond general intelligence: The du...

Kaufman, Scott Barry.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Beyond general intelligence: The dual-process theory of human intelligence.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Beyond general intelligence: The dual-process theory of human intelligence./
作者:	Kaufman, Scott Barry.
面頁冊數:	393 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 70-06, Section: B, page: 3802.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International70-06B.
標題:	Psychology, Personality. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3362196
ISBN:	9781109206616

Beyond general intelligence: The dual-process theory of human intelligence.
Kaufman, Scott Barry.

Beyond general intelligence: The dual-process theory of human intelligence. - 393 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 70-06, Section: B, page: 3802.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Yale University, 2009.

What is intelligence? Since intelligence tests were originally constructed with the practical goal of identifying students in need of alternative education (Binet & Simon, 1916), items were devised to measure a general ability to profit from explicit instruction. Indeed, Spearman (1904) discovered a consistent tendency for cognitive test items to positively correlate with one another and he labelled this common variance g (for general intelligence). In this dissertation, I argue that g is Explicit Cognitive Ability (ECA) and I aim to go beyond g by expanding the methodologies and dependent measures traditionally studied by intelligence researchers.

ISBN: 9781109206616Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017585
Psychology, Personality.

Beyond general intelligence: The dual-process theory of human intelligence.
LDR:03428nam 2200313 4500 001 1400925
005 20111018120949.5
008 130515s2009 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781109206616
035 $a (UMI)AAI3362196
035 $a AAI3362196
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Kaufman, Scott Barry. $3 1680028
245 1 0 $a Beyond general intelligence: The dual-process theory of human intelligence.
300 $a 393 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 70-06, Section: B, page: 3802.
500 $a Advisers: Jeremy R. Gray; Robert J. Sternberg.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Yale University, 2009.
520 $a What is intelligence? Since intelligence tests were originally constructed with the practical goal of identifying students in need of alternative education (Binet & Simon, 1916), items were devised to measure a general ability to profit from explicit instruction. Indeed, Spearman (1904) discovered a consistent tendency for cognitive test items to positively correlate with one another and he labelled this common variance g (for general intelligence). In this dissertation, I argue that g is Explicit Cognitive Ability (ECA) and I aim to go beyond g by expanding the methodologies and dependent measures traditionally studied by intelligence researchers.
520 $a Toward these goals, I proposed a dual-process theory of human intelligence in which intelligent behavior is jointly influenced by Controlled and Autonomous forms of Cognition. While Controlled Cognition is largely constrained by Central Executive Functions, Autonomous Cognition is not. Further, Autonomous Cognition predicts a range of intelligent outcomes above and beyond ECA. The theory was largely supported in a sample of 177 English Sixth Form College students between the ages of 16-18. Neither implicit learning (IL) of probabilistic sequential patterns nor latent inhibition (LI) of stimuli that was previously tagged as irrelevant was related to ECA or Intellect. IL was, however, positively associated with specific components of cognitive ability, foreign language achievement, Openness to Experience, self-reported holistic intuition and impulsivity. Further, decreased LI (i.e., increased flexibility) was positively associated with self-reported faith in affective intuition and creative achievement in the Arts.
520 $a Additionally, self-reported desire and Openness to Intellectual Engagement (e.g., abstract thought), Affective Engagement (e.g., emotions), and Aesthetic Engagement (e.g., Art, Music and Fantasy) displayed differential patterns of predictions with the ability measures as well as deductive reasoning. They were also differentially related to self-report measures of the Big Five (Costa & McCrae, 1992), impulsivity, need for uniqueness, and creative achievement in the Arts and Sciences. Further, Fantasy Engagement predicted deductive reasoning even after controlling for ECA. The results suggest that variations in both Controlled-Reflective and Autonomous-Spontaneous forms of cognition can contribute to a more complete understanding of human intelligence.
590 $a School code: 0265.
650 4 $a Psychology, Personality. $3 1017585
650 4 $a Psychology, Cognitive. $3 1017810
690 $a 0625
690 $a 0633
710 2 $a Yale University. $3 515640
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 70-06B.
790 1 0 $a Gray, Jeremy R., $e advisor
790 1 0 $a Sternberg, Robert J., $e advisor
790 $a 0265
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2009
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3362196